Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. Soi ls found in hi.gh altitude glacially sc lUred basins and valleys, <br /> <br />These are very cold soils above timberlir ~ on steep slopes, <br />ridges and glacial benches. These soils lre shallow to mod- <br />erately deep and are associated with a h, Jh degree of rock <br />outcrop. Soil development is weak to nOIexistant in these very <br />young soils. These soils are highly sen~itive to erosion and are <br />slow to recover from disturbances. <br /> <br />2. Soils found in areas characterized by co] Luvial processes. <br /> <br />These are soils on steep side slopes. These soils are generally <br />shallow to moderately deep devellJping in residuum and colluvial <br />material. Development is weak t,) moderate and the soils are cold <br />and moist. Dominant vegetation Ls mixed conifer. When vegeta- <br />tive cover is removed, these soiLs are succeptable to moderate to <br />high erosion. <br /> <br />3. Soil) found in areas of alluvial deposits. <br /> <br />These are alluvial soils in the drainage bottoms. They are <br />generally deep, well drained and somewhat coarse textu~ed. <br />Development is moderate and the soils are cold and moist. They <br />occur mainly along Oh-Be-Joyful Creek on fairly gentle slopes. <br />Vegetation is mixed conifer and high ele~vation riparian. <br /> <br />J. AIR RESOURCE <br /> <br />F~om an air quality standpoint, the Oh-Be-Joyful Wilderness Study ArEa <br />is nearly pristine. High levels of suspended particulates found <br />nearby in the Slate and East River valleys do not extend into Oh-Be- <br />Joyful due to topography and airflow patterns. Ambient air quality <br />monitoring data collected south of the area in Coal Creek and Alkali <br />Basin indicates that the general area has air quality significantly <br />better than ambient air quality standards. <br /> <br />The Clean Air Act (Sections 160-169) provides for protection of pristine <br />areas such as Oh-Be-Joyful, through Prevention of Significant Deteri ra- <br />tion (PSO) requirements. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) s <br />charged with administering the PSD regulations in Colorado (in the <br />absence of approved enabling State legislation). One such requireme. t <br />is for a PSD permit for all major emitting facilities, as dE~fined by <br />the Act, that would affect the area's air quality. Current~y there <br />are no existing or planned facilities in t:he general area that meet <br />the definition of major emitting facilitiE's. The EPA has d(~termined <br />that the proposed Mt. Emmons Project (Al-lA):, Inc) will not meet the <br />criteria to be classified as a Ilmajor emit:ting source", and will not <br />be required to obtain ~ PSO permit. <br /> <br />40 <br />