Laserfiche WebLink
<br />031527 <br /> <br />interests) to gather mineral relat:ed data. If selected, the <br />Forest Service will maintain the f~xisting wilderness character <br />for two years after the date of submission of a wilderness <br />recommendation to Congress. If no action is taken by Congress <br />during that period, the Forest 5elvice will then manage the area <br />for nonwiljerness purposes under the Forest Land and Resource <br />Management Plan, as directed by Cc'ngress in the Colorado wilder- <br />ness Act. <br /> <br />4. NO ACTION <br /> <br />The "No Action" alternative is to continue to manage the Study <br />Area in accordance with the East River Land Management Plan as <br />temporarily modified by the Colorado Wilderness Act. Mine~al <br />operations will be approved in accordance wit}- ~lilderness \ct of <br />1964 requirements. This action can be appliec only until ))ecember <br />1983 when the President is required to make the wilderness suitability <br />reconunendation to Congress (Colorado Wilderne~;s Act). 5el ~ction <br />of this alternative would alJow about two add]tional years for <br />the respolsible government a<:encies. and the private sector to <br />gather mineral related data. <br /> <br />5. SUITABLE j'OR WILDERNESS DESIGNATION WITH MODIFICATION OF EASTERN <br />BOUNDARY <br /> <br />As was alternative 3, this alternati'Je was added to this study <br />after publication of the Draft Envir')Tunental Impact Statement and <br />the analysis of public response. Thl~ alternatLve is similar to <br />the unqualified suitable alternative (#1), except that the <br />President ....ould recommend a change iI' the eastern boundary to <br />eliminate :in area of suspected molybdenum mineralization under <br />active exploration from the area recommended for wilderness <br />designation. This alternative, if adopted, would eliminate 2030 <br />acres in the Oh-Be-Joyful Study Area from wilderness designation <br />(see map, ~igure II-I). <br /> <br />D, ~!lJ:IMARY OF !l_NVI_RONME3lJ!'~_ S:_O!lSEQUENC~S <br /> <br />The following (rable 11-1) is a comparison of the environmental and <br />administrative ~mpacts of the alternatives for the Oh-Be-Joyful Wilder- <br />ness Study Area, <br /> <br />The information sununarized in the table is developed in more detail in <br />Section IV - Enlironmental Consequences. <br /> <br />This is a legis Lative EtS to ma'<.e a recommendation on the wilderness <br />suitability for the Stu ly Area. Because there are no other actions <br />proposed, no specific m tigatin'J measures were identified for any of <br />the alternatives. <br /> <br />15 <br />