My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01644
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01644
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:03 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:35:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
3/14/1997
Author
Bradford Austin
Title
Report to the Commissioner of Agriculture - Ground Water Monitoring Activities - Arkansas River Valley Alluvial Aquifer 1994-1995
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />pesticides <br />metals <br />inorganics <br /> <br />solid phase extraction: GC/MSD <br />ICP / GFAA <br />varies with analyte <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1409 3, <br /> <br />Spikes <br /> <br />Up to five pesticide spiked samples were submitted to the organic laboratories <br />" for lab QAlQC, These spiked samples were prepared in duplicate in <br />accordance with instructions provided by the manufacture of the spiking kits, <br /> <br />4, Duplicate Spikes <br /> <br />Duplicate spiked samples as described above, <br /> <br />Ground water samples were protected from undue exposure to light during handling, <br />storage, and transport, Samples were stored on ice to prevent temperature extremes and <br />transported to the CDA, or CSU laboratory and analyzed within the recommended holding <br />periods, Documentation of actual sample storage and treatment were handled as part of the chain <br />of custody procedures, <br /> <br />DECONTAMINATIClN PRClCEDURES <br /> <br />Wells were sampled to minimize the potential for cross contamination, Decontamination <br />procedures were adhered to between each sampling event. AIl common sampling equipment was <br />decontaminated prior to and between all sampling events by washing with a nonphosphate <br />detergent and triple rinsing with deionized water, Since pesticides were the constituents of most <br />concern due to the low levels detectable, no sampling equipment was common between wells for <br />the pesticide sampling, <br /> <br />CClNTRClL C>F CClNTAMINATED MATERIALS <br /> <br />The sampling team disposed of all wastes produced during the investigation in accordance <br />with Federal and State regulations, Disposable sampling equipment was bagged, removed from <br />the site, and disposed of as a nonhazardous material. <br /> <br />LABClRATORY ANALYSES <br /> <br />AIl water samples were analyzed for selected pesticides currently used in the area, basic <br />inorganic minerals including nitrate, and dissolved metals, Table 3 provides a listing of the <br />laboratories used, the chemicals analyzed by each, and their detection limits, AIl collected <br />samples (classified as environmental samples) were transported to the designated laboratory as <br />medium hazard and analyzed accordingly, EP A analytical methods for each parameter group <br />were as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.