Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9 <br /> <br />C'J <br />(,;i) <br />"'~ <br />~ <br />,,7> <br />,:;> <br /> <br />Wi th the State of Colorado, the Bureau plans to deve lop llead and San Luis <br />Lakes into a recreation and wildlife area. Before San Luis Lake silted up <br />and became foul slOe 11 ing and bracki sh in the late 1950' s, it was a very <br />popular recreation area. The plans call for the delivery of enough water <br />to stabllze a higher water level in the lakes. Water will be periodically <br />pumped through the system so that the lakes will not stagnate. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />There are other Project benefits which are not formally identified as pur- <br />poses justifying the Project. These "spin off" benefits are mostly related <br />to requirements of Federal laws. Extensive studies of the Closed Basin's <br />ecology, archeology, and history have been done (see section III). These <br />studies are required to identify possible Project effects to these resources <br />and to develop mitigation plans. The results of these studies are <br />available to the public. Scientists and interested local residents can use <br />tllis information to learn about these unique and interesting aspects of the <br />San Luis Valley. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Perhaps the most important of the "spin off" benefits are the enp,ineering, <br />water table, and geological studies which are required for the Pruject to <br />be designed properly. The results of these studies (section III) are also <br />available to the public. Radosevich and Rutz' report, which was cited at <br />the beginning of the section, concludes with some advice. The Valley's <br />economic/water interest groups are counciled to negotiate with each other <br />rather than hale each other before courts of law. The purpose of such <br />negotiation would be to develop a Valley-wide system of water allocation <br />which would be both fair and clearly understood. No restraint on indivi- <br />dual constitutional rights to seek redress in the courts is intended. The <br />point is, quite simply, that the Valley's present course of defining a <br />system of water rights piecemeal, individual court case by court case, will <br />have negative results. Defining the relationship of Valley water rights to <br />each other in the courts will result in a huge body of individual rulings <br />and decrees. Some rulings will probably be contradictory. Regardless of <br />the outcor.le, legal fees \"il1 be enormous. <br /> <br />It will not be easy to negotiate a fair and legally binding system outside <br />of the courts. The work should be done by people whose vital economic <br />interests are directly involved. The information the Bureau has collected <br />should help, No one can be expected to make a decision which may directly <br />affect his livelihood without some solid facts about what the results of <br />that decision will be, Information has been collected by the Project on <br />how water tables are related, what happens with different kinds of water- <br />pumping operations, and on how those things affect vegetation. These data <br />shouid help individuals make informed decisions. <br /> <br />In the long run, the information provided by the Project may be a greater <br />benefit than the water it is being built to salvage. The completed <br />Project can be logically viewed as a closely watched gage on the terminal <br />end of the whole northern Valley's ground water system. Like a measuring <br />instrument, the Project will not directly affect the rest of the system. <br />The Project's network of observation wells will show whether or not the <br />northern Valley's water supplies are being used to the full potential <br />allowed by nature, The Bureau should not and cannot take any direct action <br />with that information. The Bureau will make that information available to <br />local groups. They can use it and work together to plan a fair and secure <br />long-term future for the San Luis Valley. <br />