My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01643
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:32:03 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:35:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8543
Description
Closed Basin Division
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
8/1/1984
Author
USBOR
Title
The San Luis Valley Project - Closed Basin Division - Facts and Concepts about the Project - Revised 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />m <br />';;..,) <br />"':..... <br />..-( <br />,";:) <br />,';:) <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />In addition to providing a reliable supply of water, the Project is <br />designed to fulfill the following objectives and responsibilities: <br /> <br />1. To J?uild the Project with absolutely minimum adverse social and economic <br />effect, <br /> <br />2. Without damage to the environment, <br /> <br />3. Without damage to important archeological and historic sites, */ <br /> <br />4. To enhance recreational opportunities, and <br /> <br />S. To provide wildlife benefits. <br /> <br />The Project is designed to salvage water presently being lost to evapora- <br />tive processes from the Closed Basin area of the northern Valley. Thus, the <br />primary means of securing water without affecting historic use is for the <br />Project to tap into a source of water which is not being beneficially used. <br />The Project design calls for a network of between 150 and 180 shallow wells <br />spread out over an area of 130,000 acres (less than 1 well per section of <br />land on the average). The 130,000 acres wi thin the formal Pro jec t boun- <br />daries consist of the sump area of the Closed Basin. This area is the <br />lowest point in the Valley other than the bed of the Rio Grande itself. <br />Water which reaches this part of the Valley, either on or below the sur- <br />face, has quite literally no place to go but up. Most of the water which <br />reaches the Closed Basin sump comes from the Sangre de Cristos on the east <br />side of the Valley. The Project salvage well system does not depend on the <br />very small amount of water which flows through the developed farmland to <br />the west of the Project area. The salvage well system is designed so that <br />it cannot "suck the water out from belo\~" the lands surrounding the Project.. <br /> <br />The law authorizing the Project (Public Law 92-514) provides further <br />assurance that effects to historic local water use will be inconsequential. <br />By law, the Project wells cannot tap into the first widespread artesian <br />aquifer. At a depth between 90 and several hundred feet below the surface <br />of the whole Valley floor, layers of imperme.able clay seal off an enormous <br />reserve of water. When a pipe (an artesian well) is inserted into the <br />lower levels, the pressure causes water to flow naturally to the surface. <br />Some of the first artesian wells I"hich were drilled in the Valley sent <br />geysers of water over 50 feet in the air. The thousands of artesian wells <br />which have been drilled since then have relieved so much of the pressure on <br />the .artesian aquifer that many Valley artesian wells flow less and in some <br />cases no longer flow at all. Because the artes~an aquifer is of such great <br />importance to the economy of the Valley and because a new artesian well can <br />affect the flow of older artesian wells miles away, the Project is pre- <br />vented by law from contributing to the problem by tapping into the artesian <br />aquifer (for more details concerning this question see section VI and <br />questions 2 and 3). <br /> <br />*/One could perhaps object to items 2 and 3. The Project is designed to <br />minimi~e disruption of the environment and archeological sites. Mitigation pro- <br />cedures are planned for those minimal effects. The net result will be no damage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.