Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OJJ483 <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />VI. APPENDICES <br /> <br />A. PROCEDURES FOR MACffiNE PROCESSING <br />OF PRECIPITATION DATA <br /> <br />Step 1. Punching of Daily Cards <br /> <br />Data as taken from the stations involved in <br />this project, were punched into cards using the <br />following format: <br /> <br />Columns <br /> <br />1,2 <br />3-6 <br />7,8 <br />9. 10 <br />11,12 <br />13 <br />14-16 <br />17-19 <br />23-26 <br />27-29 <br />30-32 <br /> <br />state <br />alpha order no. <br />year <br />month <br />day <br />division <br />max. temp. (degrees F) <br />min. temp. (degrees F) <br />precip. (hundreths of an inch) <br />24 hr. snow fall (tenths of an inch) <br />snow depth (inches) <br /> <br />11 punches were used in the following columns: <br /> <br />14,17 <br />30 <br />26,29,32 <br />25,28 <br />23,27 <br /> <br />negative temperature <br />no snow on ground <br />trace of precip. or snow <br />precip. Or snow recorded next day <br />no precip. or snow <br /> <br />Blanks were in columns 23-26, 27-29, <br />30-32 if no observation (a day with no <br />record) was reported. <br /> <br />Step 2. Listing of Daily Cards <br /> <br />A list by months was prepared on the IBM <br />402. Monthly totals for all items in step 1 were <br />computed, and the presence of 11 punches and <br />blanks was indicated. <br /> <br />Step 3. Errors in Daily Cards <br /> <br />The list acquired in step 2 was used to check <br />for errors in punching. The totals were compared <br />with totals available from the U. S. Weather Bureau. <br />Also the totals for the first 6 items (cols. 1-13) in <br />step 1, were checked to insure correct identifica- <br />tion and date. Discrepancies were corrected by <br />checking each day in that month. <br /> <br />Step 4. Corrected Daily Cards <br /> <br />Daily cards found to be in error in step 3 were <br />repunched and verified. These corrected daily <br />cards replaced the daily cards that were in error. <br />This procedure was done by hand due to the possi- <br />bility of date errors and the small number of <br />corrected cards as compared to the original cards. <br /> <br />Step 5. Duplication of Daily Cards <br /> <br />All daily cards, as corrected, Were duplicated <br />on the IBM 514. One set was sent to the U. S. <br />Weather Bureau and the other set was retained for <br />further reduction and analysis. <br /> <br />Step 6. Storm Summarization <br /> <br />In reducing the daily cards to a smaller, more <br />workable set of "summary cardsll the following <br />definitions were used: A storm consists of con- <br />secutive days with precipitation greater than trace. <br />A storm period begins with the first day of pre- <br />cipitation in a stOrm and ends with the day preceding <br />the following run of consecutive days with precipita- <br />tion, as shown in the example below. <br /> <br />Only the station identification. data and <br />precipitation (columns 23-26 on the daily cards) <br />were used in this operation. <br /> <br />Daily {precip. 0 0 .2 .4 0 0 .2 T .6 .8 0 T T 0 0 .5 <br />Cards Serial date 1 2 ~ 7 8 ~ 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 <br /> '--r"-' ./ <br /> ---v- <br /> Storm 2 3 <br /> Serial No. <br />Summary Precip. O. 6 0.2 1.4 <br />Cards <br /> Serial day 6 8 15 <br /> storm ends <br />