WSP01632

• File Number: 8200.765
• Description: Little Snake River General
• State: CO
• Basin: Yampa/White
• Water Division: 6
• Date: 9/1/1986
• Author: DOI-BLM
• Title: Little Snake Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

PROPOSED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

not be authorized, The areas listed in a-g encompass
approximately 2 to 3 percent of the total acreage within
the resource area.

a. The area along Canyon Creek, including the adjacent
steep side slopes, to approximately 1/2 mile either side
of the creek, The actual boundary would be drawn
based on topography.

b, The area along Shell Creek, including the adjacent
steep side slopes, to approximately 1/2 mile either side
of the creek, The actual boundary would be drawn
based on topography.

c, The area along Vermillion Creek, including the
adjacent steep side slopes, to approximately 1/2 mile
to either side of the creek (the actual boundary being
based on topography), downstream to the confluence
with Douglas Draw,

d, The area along Sand Wash, including the adjacent
side slopes, to approximately 1/2 mile either side of
the wash (the actual boundary to be drawn based on
topography), from section la, T. 9 N" R. 99 W" to
its confluence with Dugout Draw,

e, The area along Yellow Cat Wash, including the
adjacent side slopes. to approximately 1/2 mile either
side of the wash (the actual boundary being based on
topography), from section 12, T. 9 N" R 98 W" to
its confluence with Sand Wash,

f. The area along Dry Creek, including the adjacent
side slopes, to approximately 1/2 mile either side of
the creek (the actual boundary to be based on
topography), from section 22, T. II N., R. 99 W"
to its confluence with Vermillion Creek.

g, The northwest facing slopes of the Vermillion Bluffs,
from the Vermillion Bluffs ridgetop road downslope
to the Dry Creek drainage.

To achieve the performance objectives, BLM has
identified performance standards that may apply to
surface disturbing activities, These standards are
presented to identify tbe types of mitigative measures
that may be necessary, based on the type of activity
to be permitted, the timing of development activities,
the geographical location, specific soil types and
conditions, etc, Depending on these variables, an
applicant will demonstrate that the performace
objectives have been met either through his/her plan
of development, using alternative measures, or through
use of appropriate suggested mitigative measures
identified below,

I. All sediments generated from the surface-disturbing
activity would have to be retained on site,

II, No construction or other surface-ilisturbing activities
would be allowed when the soils become saturated
to a depth of 3 inches or more,

III, Off-road vehicle use would be limited to existing
roads and trails,

IV, All new permanent roads would be built to meet
primary road standards (BLM standards) and their
location approved by the authorized officer. For oil
and gas purposes, permanent roads are those used for
production,

V, All geophysical and geochemical exploration would
be conducted by helicopter, horseback, on foo~ or from
existing roads,

VI. Any sediment control structures, reserve pits, or
disposal pits would be designed to contain a I DO-year,
6-hour storm event. Storage volumes within these
structures would have a design life of 25 year.;,

VII. Before reserve pits and production pits would be
reclaimed, all residue would be removed and trucked
off-site lo an approved disposal site,

VIII, Reclamation of disturbed surfaces would be
initiated before November I each year,

IX. All reclamation plans would be approved by the
authorized officer in advance and might require a bond,
if one has nor been previously posted.

These requirements would not supersede valid existing
rights on approved application for permits to drill or
developing leases or entry under the general mining
laws, They would apply to all new oil and gas leases
and to all surface disturbing activities permitted under
this plan, BLM will work with operators/permittees
to achieve performance objectives on undeveloped
leases or permits consistent with previously granted
lease rights,

3, Rights-<lf-way construction would be allowed along
Moffat County roads 4, 67, and 126 on a case-by-
case basis, Stipulations would be applied to the right-
of-way activity at the approval stage,

4, Surface-disturbing activities on isolated sites that meet
fragile soil criteria (a-b below) would be subject to
the perfonnance objectives/stipulations listed in I-IX
above, If the perfonnance objectives/stipulations could
not be met, no surface disturbance would be allowed,

a, Areas rated as highly or severely erodible by wind
or water, as described by the Soil Conservation Service
in the Area Soil Survey Report or as described by
on-site inspection.

b, Areas with slopes greater than or equal to 35 percen~
if they also have one of the following soil character-
isties: (\) a surface texture that is sand, loamy sand,

1-8