My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01632
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:58 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:34:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
Little Snake River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/1/1986
Author
DOI-BLM
Title
Little Snake Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOQ5~5 <br /> <br />Commoditv Production <br />APD rox imate 1y 638,800 ile res <br />/containing <In estimated <br />5.8 billion tons} would be <br />available for furt~er <br />consideration for leas! ng <br />(apprtl.x.;mately 418,700 <br />acres for surface/ <br />underground; approximately <br />220.100 ile res for unde f- <br />grouf1d only). <br />1.08 mi11fon acres would <br />be open to leasi n9 with <br />standard lease lems; <br />685,927 acres would be <br />open with seasonal <br />restrictions (crft ieal <br />wildlife habitat) ; 280 <br />acres would be open wi th <br />avo; dance st ipul at; ons <br />\A(.EC}; 94,970 acres would <br />be open wi th no surface <br />occupancy (crftical w; ld- <br />life habi tat; RNAs ; <br />recreation areas); 14,081 <br />acres would be closed to <br />leasing (proposed <br />wilderness I. <br /> <br />Same, e)(cept that 14,Gbl <br />acres would be withdrawn <br />from mil'leral entry <br />(proposed wilderness), <br /> <br />Renewable Resource <br />Approximately 367,100 acres <br />(contai n'i ng an estimated <br />5.2 billion tons) would be <br />available for further con- <br />sideration for leasing <br />(approxlmately 246,00 acres <br />for surface/underground; <br />approximately 121,100 acres <br />for underground only). <br /> <br />985,156 acres would be open <br />to leasing with standard <br />lease terms; 685,927 acres <br />would be open with <br />seasonal restrict; ons <br />(critical wi ldl ife <br />habitat) ; 6,780 acres <br />would be ~en with <br />avoidance stipulati ons <br />1.t.C[(s); 143,656 acres <br />would be open <br />with no surface occupancy <br />(cr; tical wildlife habi tat, <br />RNAs; recreation areas; <br />fragi Ie soil s) ; 56,881 <br />acres would be closed to <br />leasi ng (proposed <br />wl1dernessl. <br /> <br />Same, except that 56,881 <br />acres would be closed to <br />mineral entry (proposed <br />wi lderness). <br /> <br />Natural [nvi ronrnent <br />Approximately 344,900 acre!'. <br />(containi ng an estimated <br />4.9 billion tons) would be <br />avai lable for further <br />considerdtion for leasing <br />(approximately 225,300 <br />ac res for surface/un1er. <br />ground; appro.>.:imately <br />119,600 ac res for under- <br />ground. Of'\y). <br />1.00 million acres would be <br />open to 1 easi ng w; th <br />standard lease terms; <br />ti85,927 acres would be <br />open witll seasonal restric- <br />tions (critical wi ldl ife <br />habi tat) ; 6,780 acres would <br />be open with avoidance <br />stipulati ons (ACECs); <br />'D,n') acres would be (pen <br />wi th no surface occupancy <br />(cri tlCdl ....i ldl ife <br />habltat; RNAs; recreation <br />areas; fragi le soil s1 ; <br />90,887 acres would be <br />c lased to 1 easi ng <br />(proposed wi 1 derness). <br /> <br />Same, except that 90,887 <br />acres would be closed to <br />mi ne ra 1 ent ry (prop osed <br />wi lderness). <br /> <br />8-5 <br /> <br />Preferred Alternati \II? <br />Approximately 638,800 acres <br />(contal ni ng an estimated <br />5.8 billion tons) would be <br />avai 1 able for further <br />consideration for leasing <br />(approximately 396,500 <br />acres for surface/under- <br />ground; approximately <br />242,300 acres for under- <br />qround only). <br />1.05 million acres would <br />be qlen to leasing with <br />standa rd 1 ease tcnns ; <br />685,927 acres would be Cllen <br />wi th seasonal restricti ons <br />fcri tical wi ldl ife hab- <br />itat); 18,180 acres would <br />be qlen with a voidance <br />stipulati ons (ACres); <br />35,840 acres would be qlen <br />with perfonnance standards <br />(fragi1 e !:toil s); 51,310 <br />acres would be open with <br />no surface occupa~y <br />(critical wildlife <br />habitat; ~A; recreation <br />areil) ; 36,240 acres would <br />be clo!:ted to leasing <br />(proposed wilderness). <br />Same, except that 39,240 <br />acres would be clo!:ted to <br />mineral entry (proposed <br />....i lderness and ,A(ECl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.