Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Take 3 -- Order <br /> <br /> <br />* New Magma Irrigation District: 44,521 af; PooII-- 20,719; Pool 2 -- 23,802. <br /> <br />* Queen Creek Irrigation District: 33,633 af; Pool 1 -- 15,652; Pool 2 -- 17,981. <br /> <br />* San Tan Irrigation District: 4,432 af; Pool 1 -- 1,869; Pool 2 -- 2,563. <br /> <br />* Tonopah Irrigation District: 5,688 af; Pool 1 -- 2,647; Pool 2 -- 3,041. <br /> <br />* Harquahala Valley Irrigation District: 39,093 af, Pool I -- 25,102; Pool 3 -- 13,991. <br /> <br />* Hohokam Irrigation District: 38,404 af, Pool I -- 21,378; Pool 3 -- 17,026. <br /> <br />* Roosevelt Water Conservation District: 18,149 af, Pool I -- 18,149, <br /> <br />* BKW Farms, Inc.: 200 af, Pool 3 -- 200, <br /> <br />The seven agricultural districts that waived rights to CAP water service were given <br /> <br />relief from paying the "take or pay' provision of their long-tenn contracts by the CA WCD in <br /> <br />return for the waiving of their rights, The long-tenn contracts went into effect Oct. I, 1993, <br /> <br />the day the U ,S, Secretary of the Interior proclaimed the CA WCD's water delivery system <br /> <br />substantially completed, <br /> <br />Under "take or pay" the districts were required to pay a portion of the CAweD's <br /> <br />current operation, maintenance and replacement (OM&R) charge whether or not they ordered <br /> <br />water. The amount they were to pay was based upon the number of acre-feet in their <br /> <br />allocation, <br /> <br /> <br />For example, the Maricopa-Stanfield District, before waiving its right to receive 20.48 <br /> <br />percent of Colorado River water available to non-Indian agriculture, would have been entitled <br /> <br />to 217,088 af of water in 1994 and would have had to pay a fixed OM&R charge of $22.50 <br /> <br />--more-- <br />