Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Using the available water, as well as the water requirements for alfalfa <br />fran the irrigation guide, the area that could be irrigated was determined and <br />outlined on the aerial photo. Factors .Klich influenced the location of the <br />proposed irrigated field were soils, topography, shape, distance fran the farm <br />turnout, and other physical barriers. <br /> <br />An irrigation system plan was then developed. This plan included pipe sizes <br />and lengths, sprinkler pipe and nozzles, and estimated cost. With this data an <br />irrigation water management plan was developed. The irrigation water management <br />plan indicated how the system should be operated to maximize the irrigation <br />efficiency. Crop budgets were then developed to show the expected returns to the <br />landowners men using this cropping pattern and irrigation system. If the <br />landowner wished, other alternative irrigation system plans were developed using <br />the same process. Usually the alternatives developed included surface systems, <br />sideroll sprinklers, and center pivot sprinklers. <br /> <br />Unit cost, interest rates, leasing program cost, crop prices and yields were <br />obtained fran local sprinkler canpanies and other local sources. These data were <br />used in the development of the conservation plans. The crop prices were <br />converted to normalized prices for display purposes in this report. <br /> <br />The cost canparison display tables show the total cost, total cost/acre and <br />annual cost/acre for purchase versus leasing. Also the net benefits/acre are <br />shown for the acres served by the system. The graphs in the Appendix further <br />reveal the cost and benefit canparisons. A linear regression best fit line was <br />developed for the cost and benefit graphs in the Appendix. The best fit line <br />smws the average cost or benefits for the various acreages. Land costs were rot <br />included in the cost and return analysis. <br /> <br />Surface Systems <br /> <br />The Dolores Project lands are rot suited for surface irrigation systems. <br />Slopes of the undulating topography range fran 1 to 12 percent, with the majority <br />of tl1e area fran 3 to 6 percent. These slopes, with the soils found in the <br />project area, limit the design lengths of nn to 400 feet or less. An extensive <br />system of cross ditches or pipelines will be required to serve the area. <br />Extensive land leveling will also be required. <br /> <br />The expected efficiencies of the surface systems will be in the range of 35- <br />50 percent. This low efficiency will lead to under irrigation mere water is <br />smrt and to potential drainage, erosion and salt problems as well as <br />significantly lower yields. <br /> <br />The cost of efficient surface systems generally will exceed that of sprinkler <br />systems in the study area. Returns will be less than with sprinkler systems <br />because the irrigation water management will be harder to achieve. Based on <br />these reasons, surface systems are not recamnended as a viable alternative <br />irrigation system. <br /> <br />Sideroll Sprinkler Systems <br /> <br />A design for a sideroll sprinkler system was made for all of the fields <br />included in the study. Table D includes a sUllIIlary of the data collected. <br /> <br />-10- <br />