My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01569
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
2/4/1972
Author
USACOE
Title
Final Environmental Statement for Bear Creek Flood Control Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />Mr. R. G. Burnett <br />'Page 3 <br /> <br />11. The Statement is additionally inconsistent in that in several <br />places it refers to only one upstream sewage plant, in other placee <br />two. This should be clarified. <br /> <br />12. Tne Statement notes that during initial phases of project construction, <br />a water monitoring system will be undertaken to determine if water <br />quality will be sufficient to provide water contact recreation. If <br />water quality in the impoundment will be so poor as to preclude such <br />use, your Statement should discuss these matters under "Detrimental <br />Aspects Discussed". <br /> <br />13. If the flow regime oi Bear Creek is substantially altered after <br />project operation, there may be significant adverse impacts on down- <br />stream'existing parklands. Your Statement should thoroughly discuss <br />flow releases and their impact. In fact, in many projects flow <br />releases and, altered flow regimes have more adverse impacts than the <br />actual project. <br /> <br />14. Your Statement lists the removal of the mobile home court under <br />"Detrimental Aspects Discussed". Such a removal may not be an <br />adverse environmental impact. The relocation of the homes may be <br />beneficial to land use planning and development. <br /> <br />15. The initial recreation plan for the project discussed possible <br />motorized trails on the Hogback within the project boundary. We <br />believe such recreation use would conatitute a severe adverse <br />environmental impact for which there will likely be no remedial <br />measures. This should be thoroughly discussed in the Statement. <br /> <br />16. Your Statement should substantively discuss alternatives to the <br />project rather than simply listing them. In particular, we refer to <br />the possibility of flood plain evacuation.' Here, a statement of the <br />cost of this alternative wo~ld have been most informative to the <br />reader, and would have allowed the decision-maker to judge the <br />desirability of that alternative. <br /> <br />17. The flood control pool is many times larger than the conservation <br />pool. Therefore, your Statement must discuss the probability of <br />occurrence of filling all or a portion of the flood pool and the <br />adverse environmental impact which will likely occur. <br /> <br />18. The Statement should discuss project life as it affects long term <br />productivity of oue natural resources which would be irrevocably <br />committed by construction of the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.