My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01569
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:32:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
2/4/1972
Author
USACOE
Title
Final Environmental Statement for Bear Creek Flood Control Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. , <br /> <br />a deeper sediment pool, contoured land for recreation development, <br />and landscaped shallow-water basins at abandoned gravel pits. <br /> <br />Paragraphs 3d, e, and 4: Clay deposits now being extracted at the <br />proposed site for the south abutment of the dam should remain intact <br />to ensure stable conditions for the structure. Mining of clay <br />reserves just south of the active mine probably would be considered <br />in conflict with recreational use of the facility and particularly <br />so if intensified urbanization is triggered by completion of the <br />project. The same is true for sand and gravel reserves and resources <br />not only within the permanent pool and 1,950 acres of project related <br />acquisitions but also along the channel of Bear Creek downstream to <br />the Platte River. <br /> <br />General comment: Even though the sand and gravel resources under <br />consideration are not a significant portion of the total reserves <br />in the Denver area, they are the lowest cost source of such materials <br />for suburban portions of southwest Denver, south Lakewood, and other <br />growing communities. Removing the materials from the construction <br />market would force builders to use the next highest cost source. <br />The problem is compounded because nearly all nearby commercial <br />sources of construction materials are threatened by urbanization, <br />recreation development, and environment protection plans. Owing to <br />these factors, plus increasing land ,values, sand and gravel operators <br />are moving pit sites farther and farther from the city, which inevi- <br />tably results in higher material transportation costs and thus higher <br />building costs. Cost-benefit computations for projects in or near <br />metropolitan areas probably should reflect such consequences. <br /> <br />Please send us a copy of your final statement. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />Qd7}~' .. <br /> <br />O. M. Bishop, Acting Chief ' <br />Intermountain Field Operat on Center <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.