Laserfiche WebLink
<br />21. <br /> <br /> <br />O 'I rl {)9 '".I <br />, l~ f..) .,', q <br /> <br />various ranges of discharge were experienced. Table 2 is an example of the <br />information so prepared. This table shows flow-duration data for the gaging <br />station on Vermillion Creek near Wamego, Kansas, for each complete water <br />year of record, 1937-45, 1955, 1956. Daily discharges were separated into <br />the 20 ranges or class limits of flow listed in the first column. The class <br />limits were spaced uniformly by logarithmic scale to inClude the range in <br />daily discharge dur ing the period of record from the minimum to just over <br />the maximum. The number of days when the daily discharges fell within each <br />class limit is shown for each year. The second from the last column shows <br />a summary of the days in each class. These days are accumulated in the <br />next to last column to show the total number of days duration that the dis- <br />charge was equal to or greater than the discharge in the first column. The <br />last column is a convers ion of the accumulated days duration to percent of <br />time duration, where the total days of record is equal to 100 percent. It <br />should be observed that these results define the variations of flow without <br />regard to chronological sequence. <br /> <br />Flow distribution relations may be expressed in a number of graphical <br />forms. A plot of the data in the second from last column of table 2 with num- <br />ber of days by ordinate scale and discharge by logarithmic abscissa scale <br />would define a bell shaped graph skewed to the right and familiar;to statisti- <br />cians as a frequency distribution curve. Such a graph would illustrate the <br />variation of flow, .but not in a conveniently usable form because of its curva- <br />ture. Of g.reater versatility is a cumulative graph of the same data plotted <br />from percent duration of flow in the last column of table 2. Graphs so de- <br />fined are termed .flow-duration curves. They approach a straight line in <br />shape if appropriate scales are selected. The ordinate scale of discharge <br />should be logarithmic and the abscissa scale a probability scale ofp-e:reen:t <br />of time as introduced by Hazen4 and mathematically developed by Foster. 5 <br />A plot of the flow-duration data of table 2 is shown by open circles on figure <br />61. Discharges are expressed as cubic f<jet per second per square mile of <br />drainag.e basin so the values may be compared with those of other stations. <br />A curve through these circles would depict the actually observed duration of <br />flow for the period of record en<iing September 30, 1956. Similar values are <br />shown for 122 stations in the section of this report entitled, I'Flow.Dura'tion <br />Data. " <br /> <br />Lo.n g - T e r m Com par a b Ie ReI a t ion s <br /> <br />For statewide, long-range water-planning purposes, flow-duration curves <br />should incorporate the three following characteristics: (1) The period of rec- <br /> <br />4 Hazen, Allen, 1916, Journal Boston Soc.. Civ. Engr., pp. 77, 209c303" <br />324-328. <br /> <br />5 Foster, H, A. 1950, Stream 'flow variability, Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng";, <br />vol. 115, pp. 1101-1108. <br />