My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01548
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
7/1/1987
Author
EPI
Title
An Analysis of the Animas-La Plata Project - Durango-Colorado - July 1987
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />La Plata project. <br /> <br />In the meetings with the Tribal representatives the picture <br />of needing water so Tribal members will no longer have to <br />truck water in or carry it to their homes is presented. So <br />is the picture of developing an agricultural base for export <br />of agricultural products- leavinq aside the fact that their <br />non-Indian neighbors will be producing the same products <br />for some of the same markets. And last but not leas~ is <br />the picture presented in testimony of developing energy <br />resources. <br /> <br />Even though the EIS on the project could not address <br />specific concerns about such development because there was <br />at the time no specific plan-by the Tribes, a "hypothetical <br />analysis of impacts" was included. <br /> <br />.If the Southern utes were solely interested in mining the <br />coal and having it marketed in the Southwest, they would <br />need 625 acre-feet of water annually for a 9.1 million ton <br />run-of-mine coal development operation which would be 35 <br />years in operation. <br /> <br />Similarly, the ute Mountain utes would only need 65 <br />acre-feet of water annually for an 89l,000 ton mining <br />operation that would operate for 35 years. <br /> <br />In both cases an expanded rail spur would be necessary in <br />order to move the coal. <br /> <br />If the Southern utes were interested in developing a coal- <br />fired steam generation operation (four 435 meqawatt units <br />with a 35 year plan life), that operation would need 1,000 <br />acres of land and 26,000 acre-feet of water annually (that <br />is to say, all of the M&I water they would receive from <br />the Animas La Plata Indian Water Rights Agreement). The <br />construction time would be 4 years per unit for a total of <br />11 years commencing the first year of water delivery from <br />the project. The operation would need 5.1 million tons of <br />coal per year. <br /> <br />The ute Mountain utes proposal calls for one 275 megawatt <br />unit, requirinq 250-500 acres of land with 4,100 acre-feet <br />of water per year (one-half of the ute Mountain ute M&I <br />yield from the Agreement). The unit would use 810,000 tons <br />of coal a year. <br /> <br />A Coal Gasification scenario inVOlving a 250 million <br />cubic-foot-per-day Lurgi coal gas plant was also examined. <br />Only coal reserves removable by strip mining operations <br />on the Southern Ute Reservation are sufficient for .uch a <br />plant. This would take 2 and one-half years"'~o cons~ruct <br />plus 2 years to construct the mine and require 8.8 million <br /> <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.