Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In its comments on the EIS, the u.s. Environmental <br />Protection Agency seriously questioned the accuracy of the <br />USBR's salinity control claims. The EPA believes that the <br />costs and delays associated with salinity control projects <br />cast serious doubt as to the duration of these "temporary" <br />increases. Even under the most optimistic of salinity <br />control scenarios, 20 years of salinity levels on the order <br />of 100 mg/liter above the 879 mg/liter level could exceed <br />$686,000,000 in damages before the trend toward increases <br />in salinity is reversed. No reliable estimate can be made of <br />the damage that will occur before the tarqet salinity levels <br />are finally achieved. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In order to avoid these environmental and economic costs, <br />EPA has advocated consideration of a salinity offset policy <br />similar to the offset policy that has been used to permit <br />new clean industry in nonattainment areas where air ~ality <br />standards are violated. Under the offset pOlicy, new air <br />pollution sources are permitted only if emissions from <br />existing sources are reduced to compensate for emissions <br />from the new facility and the new facility has pollution <br />controls that result in the lowest achievable emission rate <br />for the pollutant in question. <br /> <br />Under a salinity offset policy, increased salt loadinq or <br />concentration by a project such as Animas La Plata would <br />require correspondinq salinity reductions elsewhere in the <br />basin. Thus, a development scheme which adversely impacts <br />water quality would be allowed to proceed only if it were <br />mitiqated by some other activity which would at least <br />nullify these adverse effects. The test for adequacy in <br />mitigation should be that a control project or strategy is <br />being actively and successfully implemented concurrently <br />with the project. The proposed Animas La Plata project fails <br />to meet this test. <br /> <br />The USBR appears to have overlooked the salinity impacts <br />of surface mining. Field studies conducted elsewhere in <br />Colorado indicate that surface mining may increase salt <br />yields by nearly two tons per acre per year, an increase of <br />more than soot above the salt yield from undisturbed ground. <br />In view of the approximately 8000 acr.. that would be <br />surface mined in the study area, the cumulative incr.ases in <br />groundwater salinity could be very significant. <br /> <br />The EPA concludes that the hiqh costs of providing storage <br />in the Animas La Plata project, the expens. of pumping and <br />treating (possibl. beyond conventional treatment) Animas <br />River water for drinkinq water supply purpos.s, and <br />the present inefficient use of water in Duranqo require <br />a complete analysis of the area's water needs and the <br />opportunities for conservation. Farmington'. excessively <br />high per capita water use also indicat.s the need for <br /> <br />~~ <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I';' <br /> <br />'.. <br />t" <br />~,< <br /> <br />to'. <br />\! <br /> <br />*'4 <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />35 <br />