Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />methods with actual field data where suitable data are available. <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF METHODS <br /> <br />Table 1 was prepared to provide the field investigator with a rapid <br />means of selecting a method for estimating erosion and sediment yield <br />rates. The table compares each method relative to the factors formulating <br />all methods considered so that during the planning process all the <br />methods can be considered for applicability to a particular problem. <br />By use of the table, the investigator can determine the data necessary <br />to solve the selected method within the constraints of accuracy needed, <br />time available, and financial resources. Although Table 1 provides <br />a convenient guide in selecting an appropriate method for field use, <br />it should be pointed out that the listed factors are quite general, <br />and should not be used as a substitute for a detailed study of the <br />specific characteristics of each factor. <br /> <br />The task force prepared summaries of the 12 methods selected. The objec- <br />tive of the summaries is to present a brief description of each method <br />in a format that will allow comparison among the methods. The summaries <br />in Appendix I show the essential elements of each method including <br />the location of study, physical characteristics of the research area, <br />methods of analysis, predictive equations, and tests and limitations of <br />the method. The summaries are divided into two groups: (1) methods <br />for estimating erosion, and (2) methods of sediment yield prediction. <br /> <br />SOME APPLICATIONS OF ON-SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT YIELD <br />METHODS USING FIELD DATA <br /> <br />As stated in the Introduction of the report, the Task Force intended <br />to test many of the selected methods in areas of the Pacific Southwest <br />region where adequate field data were available. This has not been <br />possible to complete but some applications are presented here for one <br />on-site erosion method--the universal soil loss equation (Wischmeier and <br />Smith, 1965), and one sediment yield method--the predictive equation <br />of Flaxman (1972), as revised (1974). <br /> <br />As a test of the possible utility of the Universal Soil Loss Equation <br />for rangeland applications, limited data were used from the Walnut <br />Gulch Experimental Watershed operated by the Agricultural Research <br />Service in southeastern Arizona (Renard and Simanton, 1973). The utility <br />of the soil loss method for prediction purposes is predicated by the <br />need to evaluate the soil, cover and land treatment factors from some <br />known locations for arid and semiarid rangeland conditions. <br /> <br />The Universal Soil Loss Equation as presented by Wischmeier and <br />Smith (1965) is <br /> <br />A = RKLSCP <br />where A is the computed soil loss per unit area. <br />R, the rainfall factor, is the number of erosion-index units in a <br />normal year's rain. The erosion index is a measure of the <br />erosive force of specific rainfall. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />