My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01538
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01538
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:31 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1974
Author
Unknown
Title
Report of the Water Management Technical Subcommittee - Erosion and Sediment Yield Methods - April 1974
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />K, the soil-erodibility factor, is the erosion rate per unit of <br />erosion index for a specific soil in cultivated continuous <br />fallow, on a 9-percent slope 72.6 feet long. The reasons for <br />selection of these conditions as unit values is explained in <br />the detailed discussion of this factor. <br />L, the slope-length factor, is the ratio of soil loss from the <br />field slope length to that from a 72.6-foot length on the <br />same soil type and gradient. <br />S, the slope-gradient factor, is the ratio of soil loss from the <br />field gradient to that from a 9-percent slope. <br />C, the cropping-management factor, is the ratio of soil loss <br />from a field with specified cropping and management to that <br />from the fallow condition on which the factor K is evaluated. <br />P, the erosion-control practice factor, is the ratio of soil <br />loss with contouring, stripcropping, or terracing to that <br />with straight-row farming, up-and-down slope. <br />Numerical values of each of the six factors have been extensively <br />determined from research data in areas east of the Rocky Mountains. <br />Scarce data has limited the usefulness of the method in the West. <br />The discussion which follows details the use of the relationship <br />in a semiarid rangeland with sparse vegetative cover receiving intense <br />convective Bummer thunderstorms producing the annual runoff. <br /> <br />Rainfall Factor (R) <br /> <br />Iso-erodent maps are available only for portions of the United States <br />east of the 104th meridian. Therefore, it was necessary to use precipitation <br />data from the Walnut Gulch Watershed to compute storm EI (total kinetic <br />energy of the storm times its maximum 30-minute intensity). The sum of <br />the computed storm EI values for a given time period is a numerical <br />measure of the erosivity of all the rainfall within that period. The <br />rainfall erosion index (R) at a particular location is the longtime-average <br />yearly total of the storm EI values. <br /> <br />The highly variable nature of the air-mass, convective thunderstorms <br />has been well documented. Accordingly, the rainfall factor associated <br />with such precipitation would also be expected to be highly variable. <br /> <br />Table 2.--Annual EI values on Walnut Gulch. <br /> <br />Index values normally exceeded once in <br /> <br />2 years <br /> <br />5 years <br /> <br />1 year <br /> <br />10 years <br /> <br />Gage No. <br /> <br />67 <br />140 <br /> <br />76 <br />210 <br /> <br />22 <br />60 <br /> <br />35 <br />23 <br /> <br />52 <br />67 <br /> <br />Table 2 illustrates the variability of the EI values from two gages <br />selected from the precipitation network on Walnut Gulch. Interestingly <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.