My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01537
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:18:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ,CO,NV,NM,UT,WY
Title
Arizona Water Protection Fund - Meetings/Newletters - Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to a Surplus, Normal, and shortage Year Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Nevada to meet Nevada's M&I needs above its basic apportionment of 0.3 maf after about the <br />year 2005. <br />B. Tiered Surplus Strategy <br />The Six State proposal for Lake Mead operation. like the California 4.4 Plan proposal. <br />envisions a tiered water management approach. In order to meet the objective of providing <br />additional water to MWD and the Southern Nevada Water Authority ("SNWA"), Arizona must <br />agree, under certain circumstances. to temporarily waive all or a portion of its legal entitlement to <br />46% of any surplus. The Six State tiered approach allows Lower Basin demands to be met <br />incrementally based on designed surplus releases under certain reservoir conditions and <br />anticipated runoff. The tiered approach steps are summarized as follows: <br />1.) Normal Year <br />During the period while the proposed interim criteria are in place. normal years will be <br />declared only when available Lake Mead storage is at or below elevation 1125 (13.569 maf <br />content). This represents about 3.8 maf of available storage capacity above the minimum power <br />pool. 'This amount of storage will allow a minimum of five years of normal year deliveries <br />through a drought cycle represented by the 33'" percentile lowest five year average of historic <br />runoff. At the end of the five-year period. the reservoir elevation would be at 1083. which is the <br />minimum power head (9.764 maf content). While this elevation is greater than the protection <br />level proposed for declaration of shortages. the Six States feel that surplus declarations must be <br />terminated 5 years before power production is impacted. rather than 5 years before the SNW A <br />water intake structure is impacted. <br />In a normal year, California will be limited to 4.4 maf of consumptive use. and Nevada <br />will be limited to 0.3 maf of consumptive use. unless unused apportionment is available from <br />Arizona. <br /> <br />2.) Partial M&I Surplus <br />During the interim period. MWD and SNW A will be allowed to increase orders which <br />would result in California's and Nevada's consumptive uses exceeding their basic apportionments. <br />Under the partial surplus tier, the surplus volume would not be large enough to keep the Colorado <br />River Aqueduct full nor to meet all of the potential needs of the SNW A. The volume of surplus <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.