My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01537
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:18:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ,CO,NV,NM,UT,WY
Title
Arizona Water Protection Fund - Meetings/Newletters - Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to a Surplus, Normal, and shortage Year Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />rights and agricultural districts) which could keep the Colorado River Aqueduct full without <br />requiring additional surplus deliveries. The Six States fully anticipate and expect that the water <br />use of the more senior agricultural users will be carefully monitored by California and the Bureau <br />of Reclamation and to the extent the inigation districts do not use water within their contract <br />entitlements, that water will be made available to MWD. thereby reducing the need for surplus <br />releases from Lake Mead. <br />Likewise. to the extent that unused Arizona or Nevada basic apportionment can be made <br />available to California users under the provisions of Article II(B)6 of the Decree, that water also <br />must be counted against MWD's needs prior to determiniog the need for any surplus water <br />derived under the interim criteria. <br />8.) To the extent that these interim criteria operate to provide extra water to municipal <br />and industrial water users in Southern California. municipal and industrial water users in the other <br />Lower Division States must be afforded the same opportunity. within the allocations defined by <br />the Law of the River. For example. if the Secretary declares a surplus. it must be recognized that <br />municipal and industrial water users in Nevada and Arizona would also be entitled to water above <br />the states' basic apportionments 10 meel their needs. <br />9.) The Six Stales are well aware that the revised Draft 4.4 Plan calls for a <br />considerable amount of groundwater banking within California at sites in the Cadiz Basin. <br />Hayfield/Chuckwalla Basin. and Desert/Coachella Basin. These proposals will depend upon the <br />availability of surplus Colorado River water. The Six States are concerned that under some <br />circumstances these off stream banking proposals will lower reservoir levels to the point where <br />the following year a "space building" type surplus will not be declared. The interim operating <br />criteria proposed in the Draft 4.4 Plan insulates MWD from the effects of this condition by merely <br />triggering a "Level 2 surplus" which still will keep the Colorado River Aqueduct full. The Six <br />States believe that off stream banking of surplus water must be limited to only those years when a <br />reservoir spill would otherwise be imminent. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.