My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01537
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:18:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States
State
AZ
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ,CO,NV,NM,UT,WY
Title
Arizona Water Protection Fund - Meetings/Newletters - Proposal for Interim Lake Mead Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to a Surplus, Normal, and shortage Year Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UUU,)ll't <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />to the Six States. These parameters are consistent with and based upon the principles described in <br />the paper issued by the Six States on October 20. 1998 titled Backl!Tound and Principles for <br />Ne!!otiation - Special Interim Criteria for Releases of Water from Lake Mead Durin!! <br />lmolementation of the California 4.4 Plan. <br /> <br />II. Consistencv with the Law of the River <br />It goes without saying that any interim operating criteria implemented to assist California <br />in its program to eliminate its dependence on Colorado River water above its basic apportionment <br />must be consistent with the Law of the River. Of particular imponance in developing the interim <br />criteria will be the apportionment system decreed by the United States Supreme Court under <br />which water diverted into any of the three Lower Division States must fit within one of three <br />categories: <br />1.) The water diverted is within that state's basic apponionment. Article II(B)(l) of <br />the Decree. 374 U.S. 340 (1964). <br />2.) The water divened is water that has been declared by the Secretary of the Interior <br />as surplus water available above the 7.5 mafbasic apponionment available to the Lower Division <br />States. It must also be recognized that. of any amount declared to be available as surplus. only <br />50% of that amount is available to California. unless Arizona or Nevada choose not to divert and <br />use the 46% and 4% of the surplus amount that is available to those states. respectively. Article <br />II(B)(2). <br />3.) <br /> <br />The water divened is water that was available to one of the other Lower Division <br /> <br />States in accordance with a) or b). above. but was unused by that state. Article II(B)(6). <br /> <br />m. Other Policv Considerations <br />In addition to the need for the interim reservoir operating criteria to be consistent with the <br />existing Law of the River, the Six States assert that. as a matter offairness to all Colorado River <br />Basin States, the process of developing and promulgating interim criteria shall be consistent with <br />the following principles: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.