Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I! I' I, <br /> <br />STUDY APPROACH <br /> <br />The study has been conducted in consultation with the Work Group. The study approach has <br />been to explore alternative concepts, make Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) model <br />runs and comparisons, and recommend concepts for more detailed investigation or for <br />implementation in development of Annual Operating Plans (AOP). Reclamation has been <br />responsible for study management and for conducting all CRSS modeling exercises and <br />presenting the data results to the Work Group. The Work Group reviewed study results and <br />worked with Reclamation to reformulate the model studies needed to address the questions <br />raised . <br /> <br />The results of each run were compared with a base case analysis. Following the comparison, <br />issues and concerns were revisited to determine if additional modeling runs were needed. <br />Over the course of the study, hydrologic and water use changes occurred and the model <br />studies were revised to address specific questions. The three most significant changes were <br />the 1987 through 1992 drought which drew the initial storage conditions down; the most <br />recent Central Arizona Project (CAP) projected water delivery schedule which extended the <br />time frame when CAP would be fully diverting their apportionment until year 2035 and <br />extended out projections of the year that the lower basin would be using less than the full <br />apportionment of 7.5 maf ti1l year 2009; and the inclusion of unmeasured return flow. From <br />modeling the effects of these changes the studies recognized that the surplus strategy needs to <br />factor in both the level of storage and the level of total basin depletion. <br /> <br />During the spring of 1993 Reclamation worked with the Basin States conducting studies of <br />banking alternatives using the CRSS-EZ model. CRSS-EZ is an annual time step model that <br />is less complex, and more user friendly than CRSS. Use of the model as a planning tool <br />offers several practical advantages as multiple alternatives can be easily considered, displayed <br />and studied. And the effects of changes to initial storage conditions, scheduled forecast <br />depletions, or other conditions can be quickly assimilated and discussed. Following the <br />reduction in CAP depletion schedule and inclusion of unmeasured returns, the surplus studies <br />used the CRSS-EZ model to examine the multiple alternatives and issues. <br /> <br />CRSS-EZ Model: <br /> <br />The CRSS-EZ Model <br /> <br />Simulates the river system on an annual basis <br /> <br />Uses methods of the CRSS monthly time step model that can be <br />implemented annually <br /> <br />Surplus is determined on January I, not Oct I. <br /> <br />8 <br />