Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Introduction "l ~ G~: <br /> <br />The Colorado River Board of <br />California is the State agency created <br />by the Legislature in 1937 for the <br />purpose of protecting the rights and <br />interests of the State, its agencies, and <br />its citizens in the water and <br />hydroelectric power resources of the <br />Colorado River System, The duties of <br />the - Board are set forth in Sections <br />12527 through 12533 of the California <br />Water Code. The activities of the <br />13-member staff are directed by the <br />Chief Engineer. The California <br />Attorney General is legal counsel to <br />the Board, <br />The Board consists of a total of 11 <br />members. Six members are appointed <br />by the Governor from the agencies <br />with Colorado River water and power <br />rights-City of Los Angeles <br />Department of Water and Power, <br />Coachella Valley County Water <br />District, Imperial Irrigation District, <br />The Metropolitan Water District of <br />Southern California, Palo Verde <br />Irrigation District, and San Diego <br />County Water Authority. Three <br />additional members are appointed by <br />the Governor from the public and the <br />Directors of the Departments of <br />Water Resources and Fish and Game, <br />or their designees are ex-officio <br />members of the Board. The Governor <br />annually appoints a Chairman from <br />among the members of the Board <br />other than the latter two members or <br />their designees, Patricia C. Nagle <br />continued as Chairman of the Board <br />during 1978. Harold F. Pellegrin, <br />Executive Secretary of the Board since <br />1953, retired in September 1978 and <br />Dennis B, Underwood was appointed <br />as the new Executive Secretary. <br /> <br />Colorado River <br />Operations <br /> <br />Operations During 1978 <br /> <br />The estimated virgin flow of the <br />Colorado River at Lee Ferry during <br />the 1977-78 water year (October 1 <br /> <br />through September 30) was <br />15,268,000 acre-feet. This was 111 <br />percent of the long-time average flow <br />of 13,786,000 acre-feet for the 57-year <br />period from 1922 to 1978, <br />During the water year, storage in <br />Upper Basin reservoirs increased by <br />1,900,000 acre-feet, and storage in <br />Lower Basin reservoirs increased by <br />694,000 acre-feet. As of September 30, <br />1978, the total active storage in the <br />major Upper Basin reservoirs was <br />21,812,000 acre-feet and the active <br />storage in the Lower Basin reservoirs <br />was 22,932,000 acre-feet. The actual <br />flow of the river below Glen Canyon <br />Dam at Lee Ferry for the water year <br />was 8,244,000 acre-feet. <br />The Bureau of Reclamation <br />estimated the 1977-78 water year <br />Upper Basin depletions by the Upper <br />Basin States (Colorado, New Mexico, <br />Utah, and Wyoming) at 3,906,000 <br />acre-feet, 473,000 acre-feet more than <br />the previous year. <br />Diversions less measured returns <br />from the mainstream for the major <br />water users of the Lower Basin States <br />(Arizona, California, and Nevada) <br />were 5,771,000 acre-feet for calendar <br />year 1978, 315,000 acre-feet less than <br />in 1977. Data for major California <br />users show diversions less returns for <br />calendar year 1978 at 4,596,000 <br />acre-feet, 376,000 acre-feet less than <br />1977. <br />Deliveries of Colorado River water <br />to Mexico in accordance with the <br />1944 Mexican Water Treaty totalled <br />1,727,000 acre-feet during calendar <br />year 1978 or 227,000 acre-feet in <br />excess of the Treaty's guaranteed <br />annual quantity. Of this amount, 6,176 <br />acre-feet was conveyed on an interim <br />basis to the City of Tijuana through <br />facilities of the Metropolitan Water <br />District and other agencies in <br />accordance with Minute No. 240 of <br />the International Boundary and Water <br />Commission. Of the 227,000 acre-feet <br />of delivery in excess of the Treaty's <br />guaranteed annua'l quantity, about <br />180,000 acre-feet was covered under <br />provisions of the Commission's <br />Minute No. 242, the 1973 agreement <br />with Mexico, and about 47,000 <br />acre-feet was chargeable to <br />operational control of the river and to <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />> <br />R <br />U.s. users not taking ordered water, <br />Most of the excess deliveries <br />chargeable to operational control <br />were due to uncontrollable <br />floodwaters from tributaries entering <br />the Colorado River below Hoover <br />Dam. Minute No. 240 is described in <br />the Board's 1972 Annual Report and <br />Minute No, 242 is described in the <br />Board's 1973 Annual Report. <br />The Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Act of 1974 recogn ized <br />"replacement of the reject stream <br />from the desalting plant and of any <br />Wellton-Mohawk drainage water <br />bypassed to the Santa Clara Slough <br />.. . as a national obligation. . .", <br />The Santa Clara Slough is adjacent to <br />the Gulf of California and is the <br />terminus of the canal constructed to <br />convey Wellton-Mohawk drainage <br />water and the reject stream from the <br />desalting plant through Mexico. Since <br />passage of the Act, the following <br />amount of water has been discharged <br />from the Wellton-Mohawk Drain <br />below Morelos Dam, Mexico's <br />diversion structure on the river, with <br />the drainage water flowing through <br />the lined canal to the Santa Clara <br />Slough since its completion on June <br />23, 1977: <br /> <br />Drainage Water <br />Released Below <br />Morelos Dam <br />(Acre-feet) <br />113,645 <br />214,729 <br />205,395 <br />206,822 <br />180,374 <br /> <br />920,965 <br /> <br />Period <br /> <br />June 25 to December 31, 1974., <br />1975 Calendar year,..........,.....,..., <br />1976 Calendar year...,.....,....,....... <br />1977 Calendar year..,.......,.,......... <br />1978 Calendar year...................... <br /> <br />Total through 1978,.....,........... <br /> <br />The Department of the Interior's Fi- <br />nal Environmental Statement on the <br />Title I facilities, Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Project, recognizes <br />these bypassed quantities as a debit <br />against the water to be salvaged by <br />lining the Coachella Canal. The State- <br />ment indicates that credits from the <br />Coachella Canal lining salvage would <br />be used to offset past debits, to credit <br />against brine discharge from the future <br />desalting plant, and to accumulate <br />credits to offset future brine dis- <br />charges. <br />