<br />Introduction "l ~ G~:
<br />
<br />The Colorado River Board of
<br />California is the State agency created
<br />by the Legislature in 1937 for the
<br />purpose of protecting the rights and
<br />interests of the State, its agencies, and
<br />its citizens in the water and
<br />hydroelectric power resources of the
<br />Colorado River System, The duties of
<br />the - Board are set forth in Sections
<br />12527 through 12533 of the California
<br />Water Code. The activities of the
<br />13-member staff are directed by the
<br />Chief Engineer. The California
<br />Attorney General is legal counsel to
<br />the Board,
<br />The Board consists of a total of 11
<br />members. Six members are appointed
<br />by the Governor from the agencies
<br />with Colorado River water and power
<br />rights-City of Los Angeles
<br />Department of Water and Power,
<br />Coachella Valley County Water
<br />District, Imperial Irrigation District,
<br />The Metropolitan Water District of
<br />Southern California, Palo Verde
<br />Irrigation District, and San Diego
<br />County Water Authority. Three
<br />additional members are appointed by
<br />the Governor from the public and the
<br />Directors of the Departments of
<br />Water Resources and Fish and Game,
<br />or their designees are ex-officio
<br />members of the Board. The Governor
<br />annually appoints a Chairman from
<br />among the members of the Board
<br />other than the latter two members or
<br />their designees, Patricia C. Nagle
<br />continued as Chairman of the Board
<br />during 1978. Harold F. Pellegrin,
<br />Executive Secretary of the Board since
<br />1953, retired in September 1978 and
<br />Dennis B, Underwood was appointed
<br />as the new Executive Secretary.
<br />
<br />Colorado River
<br />Operations
<br />
<br />Operations During 1978
<br />
<br />The estimated virgin flow of the
<br />Colorado River at Lee Ferry during
<br />the 1977-78 water year (October 1
<br />
<br />through September 30) was
<br />15,268,000 acre-feet. This was 111
<br />percent of the long-time average flow
<br />of 13,786,000 acre-feet for the 57-year
<br />period from 1922 to 1978,
<br />During the water year, storage in
<br />Upper Basin reservoirs increased by
<br />1,900,000 acre-feet, and storage in
<br />Lower Basin reservoirs increased by
<br />694,000 acre-feet. As of September 30,
<br />1978, the total active storage in the
<br />major Upper Basin reservoirs was
<br />21,812,000 acre-feet and the active
<br />storage in the Lower Basin reservoirs
<br />was 22,932,000 acre-feet. The actual
<br />flow of the river below Glen Canyon
<br />Dam at Lee Ferry for the water year
<br />was 8,244,000 acre-feet.
<br />The Bureau of Reclamation
<br />estimated the 1977-78 water year
<br />Upper Basin depletions by the Upper
<br />Basin States (Colorado, New Mexico,
<br />Utah, and Wyoming) at 3,906,000
<br />acre-feet, 473,000 acre-feet more than
<br />the previous year.
<br />Diversions less measured returns
<br />from the mainstream for the major
<br />water users of the Lower Basin States
<br />(Arizona, California, and Nevada)
<br />were 5,771,000 acre-feet for calendar
<br />year 1978, 315,000 acre-feet less than
<br />in 1977. Data for major California
<br />users show diversions less returns for
<br />calendar year 1978 at 4,596,000
<br />acre-feet, 376,000 acre-feet less than
<br />1977.
<br />Deliveries of Colorado River water
<br />to Mexico in accordance with the
<br />1944 Mexican Water Treaty totalled
<br />1,727,000 acre-feet during calendar
<br />year 1978 or 227,000 acre-feet in
<br />excess of the Treaty's guaranteed
<br />annual quantity. Of this amount, 6,176
<br />acre-feet was conveyed on an interim
<br />basis to the City of Tijuana through
<br />facilities of the Metropolitan Water
<br />District and other agencies in
<br />accordance with Minute No. 240 of
<br />the International Boundary and Water
<br />Commission. Of the 227,000 acre-feet
<br />of delivery in excess of the Treaty's
<br />guaranteed annua'l quantity, about
<br />180,000 acre-feet was covered under
<br />provisions of the Commission's
<br />Minute No. 242, the 1973 agreement
<br />with Mexico, and about 47,000
<br />acre-feet was chargeable to
<br />operational control of the river and to
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />>
<br />R
<br />U.s. users not taking ordered water,
<br />Most of the excess deliveries
<br />chargeable to operational control
<br />were due to uncontrollable
<br />floodwaters from tributaries entering
<br />the Colorado River below Hoover
<br />Dam. Minute No. 240 is described in
<br />the Board's 1972 Annual Report and
<br />Minute No, 242 is described in the
<br />Board's 1973 Annual Report.
<br />The Colorado River Basin Salinity
<br />Control Act of 1974 recogn ized
<br />"replacement of the reject stream
<br />from the desalting plant and of any
<br />Wellton-Mohawk drainage water
<br />bypassed to the Santa Clara Slough
<br />.. . as a national obligation. . .",
<br />The Santa Clara Slough is adjacent to
<br />the Gulf of California and is the
<br />terminus of the canal constructed to
<br />convey Wellton-Mohawk drainage
<br />water and the reject stream from the
<br />desalting plant through Mexico. Since
<br />passage of the Act, the following
<br />amount of water has been discharged
<br />from the Wellton-Mohawk Drain
<br />below Morelos Dam, Mexico's
<br />diversion structure on the river, with
<br />the drainage water flowing through
<br />the lined canal to the Santa Clara
<br />Slough since its completion on June
<br />23, 1977:
<br />
<br />Drainage Water
<br />Released Below
<br />Morelos Dam
<br />(Acre-feet)
<br />113,645
<br />214,729
<br />205,395
<br />206,822
<br />180,374
<br />
<br />920,965
<br />
<br />Period
<br />
<br />June 25 to December 31, 1974.,
<br />1975 Calendar year,..........,.....,...,
<br />1976 Calendar year...,.....,....,.......
<br />1977 Calendar year..,.......,.,.........
<br />1978 Calendar year......................
<br />
<br />Total through 1978,.....,...........
<br />
<br />The Department of the Interior's Fi-
<br />nal Environmental Statement on the
<br />Title I facilities, Colorado River Basin
<br />Salinity Control Project, recognizes
<br />these bypassed quantities as a debit
<br />against the water to be salvaged by
<br />lining the Coachella Canal. The State-
<br />ment indicates that credits from the
<br />Coachella Canal lining salvage would
<br />be used to offset past debits, to credit
<br />against brine discharge from the future
<br />desalting plant, and to accumulate
<br />credits to offset future brine dis-
<br />charges.
<br />
|