Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:iG~3 <br /> <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY <br /> <br />EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVernor <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA <br />107 SOUTH BROADWAY, ROOM 8103 <br />LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 <br />(213) 620.4480 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />August 3, 1979 <br /> <br />Honorable Edmund G. Brown, Jr. <br />Governor of California <br />State Capitol <br />Sacramento, California 95814 <br /> <br />Dear Governor Brown: <br /> <br />We are pleased to present to you and the Legislature the Colorado River Board's <br />Annual Report for Calendar Year 1978. <br /> <br />In my letter to you dated June 27, 1978, transmitting the Board's 1977 Annual Report, <br />I pointed out the importance of California's Colorado River water supply in alleviating a <br />critical water supply problem during the 1977 drought year. I am now pleased to report <br />that both the 1978 and 1979 water years resulted in above normal runoff in the Colorado <br />River Basin and that the major water storage reservoirs now have more water in storage than <br />they did before the drought. Anticipating the reduced deliveries to California that will <br />occur when the Central Arizona Project is completed in about six years, the Board is coop- <br />eratively investigating with the Department of Water Resources and the Metropolitan Water <br />District a program whereby in years of good supply from the State Water Project, MWD would <br />take more State water, reduce its Colorado River water use and obtain credits in an account <br />to be established in Lake Mead. In years of poor water supply, MWD would reduce its taking <br />of State Project water and divert additional Colorado River water. <br /> <br />The Board's engineering staff played a major role in conducting the studies and pre- <br />paring the report of the seven-state Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum for the <br />first triennial revision of the water quality standards for the Colorado River System. The <br />Board continued its close working relationships with federal agencies and others involved <br />in the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program. There was considerable activity in <br />the lawsuit, Environmental Defense Fund vs. the Environmental Protection Agency, Department <br />of the Interior and the seven basin states to set aside the approved Colorado River salinity <br />standards. <br /> <br />A new phase of the open-ended Arizona v. California litigation commenced in December <br />1978 with the filing by the United States of a motion with the U. S. Supreme Court to per- <br />mit diversion of almost 200,000 acre-feet of additional Colorado River mainstream water to <br />the five Indian reservations for irrigation use along the lower Colorado River. These <br />tribes were allocated 1,000,000 acre-feet of diversion rights by the U. S. Supreme Court <br />in 1964. The new claims include about 86,000 acre-feet in California that would have to <br />be taken away from existing users. An old issue, that of Present Perfected Rights (pre- <br />1929 Colorado River water rights), was resolved on January 9, 1979, when the Court entered <br />a supplemental decree for their determination that was identical to one that had been <br />agreed to by the state parties and the United States. <br /> <br />These and other activities in the Colorado River Basin are described in the report <br />which follows and in a separate supplemental appendix. <br /> <br />s~ur~~ <br /> <br />PATRICIA C. NAGLE, Chairman <br />and Colorado River Commissioner <br />