Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memo to Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />From Peter Evans and E.I.Jencsok <br />December 5,1995 <br />Re: Endangered Fish Instream Flow Water Rights, "15 Mile Reach," Colo. River <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />to one of two methods as shown in the Final Notice. In either case, however, the first 300,000 <br />acre feet of the right (to be distributed on a monthly basis) should be modifiable in order to <br />assure that Colorado can fully develop its compact apportionment (paragraph 4 water under the <br />Enforcement Agreement). In addition, the Board should develop terms and conditions during the <br />water court proceedings to guide the ~t1ministration of this right and assure that it will not be <br />enforced until the 100,000 acre foot Carve Out is in full use. The remainder of the Recovery <br />Flow Water Right will be treated as Paragraph 3 water under the Enforcement Agreement. <br /> <br />CONSULTATIONS <br />During development of the noticed instream flow appropriation on the Colorado River, the <br />staff has consulted with numerous parties, including the Colorado State Engineer's Office, the <br />Division Engineer, the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the Colorado Attorney General's Office <br />and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. <br />iIlli8IIfi . A*". .. . ~ .. ---or -11" I fT 1 Lr;~ <br />." . -"-'.'~ . ....,J\WL .' . .. . . <br />that those recommendations are based upon the best available data and scientific methods. Also, <br />the Board has received many comments regarding the instream flow appropriation alternatives. <br />These comments and recommendations have been taken into consideration in formulating the <br />final staff recommendation. <br /> <br />KEY DECISION ISSUE.'l <br />The Board may need to make decisions on the issues described in Attachment 1 before <br />taking action on the staff recommendation. Key decisions that need to be made by the Board are <br />listed below: <br />~ Base Flow - Is the amount acceptable? <br />~ Recovery Flow - Should the amount be numeric or for the flows remaining after the Carve <br />Out11~ .().o"'o ~ <br />~ Carve Out - Are the amount and distribution acceptable? Are junior and senior water <br />rights addressed appropriately? <br />~ Modifiable Portion - Are the magnitude and distribution acceptable? <br />~ Modification Criteria - Should the criteria address compact issues only or compact issues <br />mll1 fish recovery flow factors? <br /> <br />BOARD ACTIONIST AFF RECOMMEND A TIONS <br />We recommend that the Board appropriate two instream flow water rights for the 15 Mile <br />Reach to conserve and recover the listed endangered fish pursuant the Recovery Implementation <br />Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin. The fIrst is the "Base <br />Flow Water Right" and the second is the "Recovery Flow Water Right." It.'~ I ','''In ~LI Jl <br /> <br />1I.l"ll.T.'_n.JIDiIiI-'-~'~~;~~ tal../.) Cl::{\ rro{Jr ~ <br />