Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,::> <br />;,? <br /> <br />'-- <br />"''''4 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />water which dissolves salt from the Mancos Shale are reduced and con- <br />,-' trolled. Some of the major washes traversing the irrigated area and <br />discharging into the river have flows with salinity levels in excess of <br />6,000 ppm of total dissolved solids. Estimates of the amount and salt <br />concentration of return flows have been made; however, more reliable <br />data and analysis of the surface and ground water ret'un systems are <br />needed before impacts of alternative control programs can be adequately <br />made. <br /> <br />The average annual salt budget for the Grand Valley area for the period <br />1964 to 1970 is given in the following table: <br /> <br /> Tnf'l()1J' n"tf'ln1aT Rf':lo~1l1 +.cmt Pi,-.k-llp <br /> Colo. R. Colo. R. Irri Upland <br /> near Plateau Gunnison at State gated Drain- <br /> Cameo Creek River Tot Line Area age Total <br /> (million tor_s) <br />Av. 1964-70 1.46 0.07 1.43 2.96 3.56 0.46 0.14 0.6 <br />Range 1964-70 1.2- 1.2- 2.4- 3.2- 0.5- <br /> 1.6 1.7 3.3 4.14 0.8 <br /> <br />An analysis of USGS water quality records (1964-70) indicate an average of <br />about 600,000 tons of salt is added to the Colorado River in the Grand <br />Valley reach. About 140,000 tons annually of the 600,000 ton pickup come <br />from the upland drainage. The balance of about 460,00) tOlli3 is estimated <br />to be added by the irrigation return flows of the Grand Valley and is rela- <br />tively uniform from year to year. <br /> <br />Preliminary analysis shows that significant variation in salt loading from <br />year to year appears to be a function primarily of surface and subsurface <br />runoff from upland drainages. Water quality information on the artesian <br />acquifer collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 1<)J5, 1951, and <br />1973 indicates no change in water quality of the acquifer. <br /> <br />Irrigation Systems and Management Improvement Needs - A detailed analysis <br />(by the Colorado Water Conservation Board) of several canal systems for <br />the 1965-71 irrigation seasons indicates that 13 to 30 percent of the water <br />diverted is consumptively used by irrigated crops. Sirrlilar results are <br />reported from Colorado State University research studies. Therefore, about <br />70 to 87 percent is spilled into surface ditches or percolates into under- <br />lying saline acquifers. This amounts to 10 to 20 feet diverted for each <br />irrigated acre. The maximum consumptive use by crops is 2.5 feet, leaving <br />the balance to return to the Colorado River each year or to be used by <br />phreatophytes in the Valley. <br /> <br />Irrigation water budgets of selected canal systems in the Valley for 1965-71 <br />are shown below: <br />