My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01461
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:27:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8549.800
Description
Rio Grande Basin-Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies-Rio Grande Assessment
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
2/1/1981
Author
Brandes Kier Stecher
Title
Water Resources Reference Base for the Assessment of the Rio Grande Region
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />NEW MEXICO WATER LAW <br /> <br />Surface Water <br /> <br />A comprehensive surface water appropriation statute was adopted in 1907 <br />(N.M.S. ~75-5-1 to 75-5-37) which, with a few amendments, is still the <br />governing law today. This early statute outlines the exclusive procedure for <br />obtaining a surface water right, as was determined in Farmers' Development <br />Co. v. Ragaldo Land and Irrigation Co. (28 N.M. 357, 213 P. 202, 1923). Like <br />Colorado, the courts have held that the common law doctrine of riparian <br />rights has never been applicable in the state. (Trambley v. Luterman, 6 N.M. <br />15, 27 P. 312, 1891; Hagerman Irri. Co. v. McMurray, 16 N.M. 172, 113 P. 823, <br />1911) . <br /> <br />The state has broadly defined a water course as any river, creek, / <br />arroyo, canyon, draw, or wash, or any other channel having definite banks and <br />bed with visible evidence of the occasional flow of water (N.M.S. ~75-1-1). <br />In the case of Jaquez Ditch Co, v. Garcia (17 N.M. 160, 124 Pac. 891), it was <br />determined that the flow of water need not be continous in order for a chan- <br />nel to constitute a water course. <br /> <br />All water in New Mexico used for irrigation purposes (N.M.S. ~75-5-21, <br />75-5-22), is considered appurtenant to the land upon which it is used and <br />is transferred with the title to the land .unless expressly severed. This <br />policy further restricts the amount of water that might ever become available <br />for other uses. Most of, but not all, the water in New Mexico has been <br />adjudicated. <br /> <br />In addition, "Pueblo Water Rights" are recognized. This is the absolute <br />right of an American city as a successor of a Spanish or Mexican pueblo, to <br />use the water which occurs in its boundaries (Cartright v. Public Service <br />Co., 66 N.M. 64, 343 P.3d 654). There have been notable exceptions to this <br />right as determined by the courts however. <br /> <br />0900 <br /> <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.