Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES <br /> <br />The availability of water in the Rio Grande Region for new uses is <br />highly restricted, and in fact, to a large extent, water is available only <br />through the purchase of previously established rights. <br /> <br />The diversion of surface waters in this Region has a long and turbulent <br />history. Although each state administers water differently, there are rigid <br />restrictions in each state. Since the Rio Grande is an interstate and inter- <br />national stream and subject to several treaties with the Republic of Mexico, <br />as well as to interstate compacts, additional restrictions are imposed on the <br />amount of water available for diversion for any purpose. <br /> <br />The question of over-appropriation of surface waters arose as early as <br />1896 when the U.S. Secretary of Interior suspended right-of-way applications <br />for access across public lands as a means of controlling irrigation water <br />usage after landowners in the El Paso area had complained of excessive diver- <br />sions from the River in the upper basin. In essence, this embargoed further <br />development of irrigation throughout the New Mexico and Colorado reaches of <br />the River. In 1898, the Republic of Mexico filed a $35 million suit against <br />the United States essentially for damages because of the limited quantities <br />of water reaching the El Paso-Juarez area. These actions, and others, led to <br />a series of interstate and international agreements which today control the <br />flow and use of water in the Rio Grande. <br /> <br />Increased competition for surface water in the Region during the past <br />twenty years has resulted in a greater awareness of ground water resources, <br />and extensive development. In some cases mlnlng of ground water has <br />occurred. Control of ground water withdrawals is the responsibility of <br />the states, and laws have been adopted in Colorado and New Mexico which <br />established appropriative systems for allocating certain ground water <br />suppl ies. <br /> <br />\::::,~ <br />,~ <br /> <br />51 <br />