My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.02
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program - Recovery Plans & Information
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
9/1/2000
Author
Paul Holden - Bio/We
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Biology Committee - Program Evaluation Report - for the 7-Year Research Period 1991-1997
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C) <br />C) <br />..... <br />co <br /> <br /><:D <br /> <br />RANGE LIMITATIONS <br /> <br />Introduction <br />Range limitation is the restriction of the area of habitat available to a species, and in rivers it typical]y occurs <br />as a result of a major change in habitat length, such as a reservoir inundating a portion of a river, a blockage <br />of access to a portion of river (e.g., by a dam), or a change in water quality that makes a portion of the river <br />unusable by certain fish species. When the SJRIP was initiated, it was known that range limitation was a <br />potential limiting factor to endangered fish species recovery within the river. Range limitation may reduce <br />the possible overall population size of the endangered species by limiting available habitat, or by the loss <br />of a portion of the range that included a key habitat. In the Green and Colorado rivers, Colorado <br />pikeminnow larvae drift from 100 to 200 miles below spawning areas to find nursery habitats. Drifting that <br />far in the San Juan River would result in the larvae entering Lake Powell, a poor nursery habitat because <br />of abundant nonnative predators. A]though no studies directly addressed range limitation, data collected <br />by several studies allowed analysis of this issue. <br /> <br />.I::Iabitat Length. <br />The length of riverine habitat for the native fishes in the Sanjuan River was dramatically reduced by Lake <br />Powell and Navajo Reservoir. Lake Powell inundated the lower 54 miles of the river (B1iesner 1999a), <br />and Navajo Reservoir inundated another 27 miles. The two endangered fishes undoubtedly utilized the <br />lower 54 miles of the river, and Colorado pikeminnowused 27 miles of what is now Navajo Reservoir for <br />habitat, and roundtail chub used the entire inundated area. It is not known if any key habitats existed in the <br />inundated areas but, based on collections of fish in that area and the location of other known spawning <br />areas in similar upstream portions of other rivers (e.g., Yampa River), a Colorado pikeminnow spawning <br />site was possible within the Navajo Reservoir section. It is probable that the lower San Juan River <br />provided nursery habitat for Colorado pikeminnow much as it does below RM 13].0 today. Compared <br />with the study area, the river in the Lake Powell reach was of similar, relatively steep gradient and did not <br />provide the type oflow-gradient reaches found in the Green and Colorado rivers (Figure 3.16) that are <br />usually associated with Colorado pikeminnow nursery areas. The river in this reach may have been similar <br />to the canyon reach (RM 20 to RM 65) of the SJRlP study area where backwaters and other low-ve]ocity <br />habitats are rare. Low-gradient, flooded bottomland habitat also did not ]ikely occur in the Lake Powell <br />reach; hence habitat for young razorback sucker would ]ikely have been similar to the present study area. <br />The two reservoirs reduced potential range and habitat for the two endangered fishes from about 325 miles <br />to only 225 miles and inundated potential Colorado pikeminnow spawning areas in the upper San Juan <br />River. <br /> <br />Some Colorado pikeminnow in the Green and Colorado river systems drifted up to 200 miles from <br />spawning areas before finding nursery habitat, although some used nursery areas only a few miles below <br />the spawning areas (Trammel and Chart] 999, Trammell et al. ] 999). Questions not completely answered <br />are: do the larvae need to drift so far, is the length of the drift related to the accessibility and availability of <br />nurse!)' habitat, or is the length of the drift related to some other factors? From ]964 to 1966, Vanicek <br />and Kramer (1969) found relatively large numbers ofYOY, age-I, and age-2 Colorado pikeminnow in <br />the Green River from the mouth of Yampa River to <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />3-37 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.