My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.02
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program - Recovery Plans & Information
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
9/1/2000
Author
Paul Holden - Bio/We
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Biology Committee - Program Evaluation Report - for the 7-Year Research Period 1991-1997
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />eM) <br />o <br />...... <br />to <br />0) <br /> <br />are apparently more important when they occur in relative proximity to each other, such as in habitat-rich <br />river reaches. Key habitats for young Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River include backwaters, <br />pools, pocket waters, and other slow-velocity habitats along shorelines. Key habitats for juvenile Colorado <br />pikeminnow were not detennined, but the fish appeared to utilize a variety of mediUlll- to slow-velocity <br />habitats. <br /> <br />Key habitats for subadult and adult razorback sucker in the San Juan River are slow-water habitats <br />including eddies, edge pools, and backwaters found in relatively habitat-rich portions of the river. Cobble <br />areas in shoreline nms are spawning locations. Habitat for young and small juvenile razorback sucker was <br />not detennined since these size classes were not collected during the 7-year research period. <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker use a great variety of habitats and do not appear to select any key habitats. Bluehead <br />sucker and speckled dace select cobble substrates and riffle-type habitats. Roundtail chub were not <br />common enough to detennine key habitats, although they use pools and eddies in tributaries. <br /> <br />The habitat studies detennined that key habitats for the two endangered fish species make up only a small <br />portion of the available habitat in the San Juan River. This is especially true of backwater and low-velocity <br />(eddies, pools) habitats. In comparison with the Green and Colorado rivers, however, actual habitat <br />amounts are very similar. Cobble bars for spawning are fairly common in the upper San Juan River. <br />Quality of backwater habitats in the San Juan River is at least comparable with that in the Green and <br />Colorado rivers, and nUlllerous cobble bars (Colorado pikemiooow spawning areas) with appropriate <br />cobble size and cleanliness were found in the San Juan River. Late summer thunderstorm activity levels <br />in the San Juan Basin are much higher than in either the Green or Colorado rivers, and sediment inflow from <br />these storms has the potential to reduce the quality of backwaters, spawning bars, and other habitats in the <br />San Juan River. <br /> <br />Key habitats are fairly well distributed in the San Juan River, except for the canyon reach from about RM <br />20 to RM 65. This reach has reduced habitat richness compared with other reaches and does not have <br />sufficient habitat to retain stocked Colorado pikemiooow. Cobble bars suitable for Colorado pikeminnow <br />are found in the upper portion of the river (Reaches 4, 5, and 6) and backwater habitat is also fairly <br />abundant in this upper portion of the river. River reaches with high habitat richness were relatively rare in <br />the San Juan River, and habitat richness peaked in Reach 5. Habitat quantity and quality was not limiting <br />to the endangered fishes during the 7 -year research period, but this may be due in part to the low nUlllbers <br />of the two species in the river. Habitat for the other native fishes was also not limiting. <br /> <br />Management Implications <br />A major concern of the SOOP during the 7 -year research period was the development of <br />flow recommendations (Holden 1999) that provide high levels of habitat quantity and quality timed to <br />meet the critical habitat needs of the endangered fishes. The development of the flow recommendations <br />concentrated on improving backwater and cobble bar habitat quantity and quality and providing high <br />habitat richness. B1iesner (I999b) showed that backwater habitat quantity <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />3-34 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.