Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C'.) <br />c) <br />...... <br />co <br />co tlannelrnouthsucker. Even with the decline in catch rates, tlannelrnouth sucker remained very abundant and <br />-.J comprised more of the total San Juan River collection than Colorado or Gunnison river collections (Ryden <br />2000a). More-recent analysis of the catch data indicates that tlannelrnouth sucker density river wide has <br />not changed because the increase in Reach 6 offset the decrease in the other reaches. But numbers of <br />juvenile flannelrnouth sucker declined from 1992 to 1993, and they have not changed much from that time <br />(K. Lawrence, Ecosystems Research, Inc., Personal Communication). <br /> <br />Flannelrnouth sucker adults are the "generalists" of the Colorado River Basin, and they are found in a <br />variety of habitats, including riffles, runs, pools, and eddies (Holden and Stalnaker 1975, McAda 1977). <br />They use cobble bars throughout the rivers for spawning and are found on the same bars razorback sucker <br />use for spawning. Larval and YOY flannelrnouth sucker are found in backwaters and other low-velocity <br />habitats in early summer. Abundance of the young declines as the summer progresses, likely because of <br />mortality and a shift in habitat use to swifter main channel habitats. Collections of flannelrnouth sucker in <br />the San Juan River showed the same generalized habitat use (Lawrence 1999). Juveniles in the San Juan <br />River were correlated with shoreline slackwater habitats in the spring and cobble-type habitats in the <br />autumn (Lawrence 1999). The change in habitat use between juvenile and adult flannelrnouth sucker was <br />seen in their use of San Juan River secondary channels (Propst and Hobbes 2000). During high flow <br />periods, secondary channels provided riffle and run habitat, and adult and larger juvenile flannelrnouth <br />sucker were the most-commonly collected fish in secondary channels. Ripe fish were collected, thus <br />suggesting spawning also occurred in secondary channels. As flows receded in late summer and autumn, <br />habitats in secondary channels became primarily low-velocity types, and larger flannelrnouth sucker were <br />seldom collected there. Although reduced in numbers, YOY flannelrnouth sucker utilized the low-velocity <br />habitats of secondary channels during that time (propst and Hobbes 2000). Flannelmouth sucker used <br />most available habitats, and no key habitats were identified. <br /> <br />Bluehead Sucker <br />Bluehead sucker was the third most-abundant fish in the San Juan River, and it was most abundant in the <br />upper portions of the river where cobble substrates predominated. Bluehead sucker was most abundant <br />in Reach 6, but their abundance decreased somewhat in the remainder of the river during the 7-year <br />research period (Ryden 2000a). Adult and juvenile bluehead sucker were typically found in cobble <br />substrate riffle and run habitats in the San Juan River (Ryden 2000a). Spawning appeared to occur on <br />cobble bars, sirrrilar to other native suckers. Adult and juvenile abundance in the San Juan River was <br />positively correlated with cobble-type habitats, particularly riffles (Lawrence 1999). Larvae and YOY <br />were found in low-velocity habitats in the summer, but sirrrilar to flannelrnouth sucker young, they tended <br />to disappear from these habitats by late summer and autumn (Archer and Crowl 2000a). Sirrrilar to <br />tlannelrnouth sucker, bluehead sucker habitat use was characterized by their seasonal use of secondary <br />channels. Adults and larger juveniles used secondary channels during higher-flow periods when riffle and <br />run habitats were available, and reduced numbers of young used them during low-flow periods when low- <br />velocity habitats predominated (propst and Hobbs 2000). Key habitats for bluehead sucker were cobble <br />substrate riffles and runs. <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />3-15 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br />