My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.02
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program - Recovery Plans & Information
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
9/1/2000
Author
Paul Holden - Bio/We
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Biology Committee - Program Evaluation Report - for the 7-Year Research Period 1991-1997
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C) <br />C-) <br />.... <br />co <br />00 <br />i'=' <br /> <br />Juveniles <br />Collection of 2- to 4-year-old wild Colorado pikeminnow (100 to 300 mm TL) is infrequent in the <br />Colorado River system. This age class appears to use a variety of habitats, including main channel <br />habitats that are swift and, therefore, difficult to seine. Their relatively small size and swimming ability make <br />them difficult to catch using electrofishing or seines; hence they are not commonly caught. As stocked <br />YO Y grew in the San Juan River, they were captured in relatively large numbers through seining and <br />electrofishing, especially above Mexican Hat, Utah. In 1997, 38 yearlings (stocked in 1996) were caught <br />during main channel electrofishing (Ryden 2000a). They ranged in size from 124 to 235 mm TL and were <br />primarily captured in shallow shoreline habitats. Most were found between the Hogback Diversion and <br />Mexican Hat, Utah, and three were collected in RM 18 near the Lake Powell interface. The 1- and 2- <br />year-old fish were collected in 1998 and 1999, and growth of these fish was comparable with, or greater <br />than, growth seen in other Upper Basin rivers (Trammell and Archer 2000). This indicated that young <br />Colorado pikeminnow found quality habitat in the San Juan River. This size-class appeared to use the <br />greatest variety of habitats and was likely the least selective. Therefore, no specific key habitats were <br />identified for juveniles and, based on the San Juan River collections, suitable habitat for this age class is <br />found throughout the river between Hogback Diversion and Mexican Hat, Utah, and in the lower 20 miles <br />of the river. <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker <br />When the SJRIP was initiated in 1991, the life history and habitat requirements of razorback sucker were <br />not as well understood as those of Colorado pikeminnow. Adult and larvae razorback sucker were found <br />in both riverine and reservoir habitats in the Colorado River Basin, but very few YOY had been collected <br />in recent times. Tyus and Karp (1989) identified razorback sucker spawning sites in the Green River and <br />collected larvae, but it was not until 1994 that YOY razorback sucker were found in flooded bottomland <br />habitat of the Green River (Modde 1996) and a more-complete picture of their habitat use emerged. These <br />studies indicated that this species spawns on main channel gravel bars near the height of peak spring flow <br />and that they show fidelity to certain bars (Modde and Irving 1998). The young hatch in a few days, drift <br />downstream, and enter flooded bottomlands that are connected to the main channel during high flow. <br />Backwaters and other low- velocity habitats are also used by larvae, but flooded bottomlands are thought <br />to be a key habitat for survival oflarvae. It is not known when young razorback sucker retwn to the main <br />river. Recent studies using stocked fish (T. Modde, USFWS, Personal Communication) suggested that <br />they may be able to spend an entire year in some off-channel bottomlands. Adults used a variety of main <br />channel- and backwater-type habitats, the latter are used especially prior to and during the spawning period <br />as apparent resting areas between spawning events on main channel cobble bars (Bestgen 1990, Minckiey <br />et al. 1991). <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />3-9 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.