My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:31:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.02
Description
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program - Recovery Plans & Information
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
9/1/2000
Author
Paul Holden - Bio/We
Title
San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Biology Committee - Program Evaluation Report - for the 7-Year Research Period 1991-1997
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />N <br />to <br />00 <br />lool <br />C) <br />c., <br /> <br />CHAPTER 2: <br /> <br />RESEARCH AND RECOVERY <br />STUDIES ON THE SAN JUAN <br />RIVER <br /> <br />HISTORICAL STUDIES <br /> <br />No comprehensive studies of fish presence, abundance, distribution, or life history were conducted on the <br />San Juan River until the late 1980s. Earlier studies are generally only usable to determine fish presence. <br />The earliest accounts of fish in this area were from a U.S. Army geographic and geologic expedition to <br />portions of the West during the early 1870s (Wheeler SUlVey): specimens collected by the expedition were <br />identified by ichthyologists at the National Museum in Washington, D.C. (Cope and Yarrow 1875). Much <br />of the early fish collections from the western United States came from similar explorations, and it was <br />common to have mistaken location information for the specimens when they arrived at museums in the East. <br />The first ichthyologist to actually visit much of the West was David starr Jordan, the father of modem <br />ichthyology in the United States, who was familiar with many of the fishes of the West from examining <br />museum specimens. Jordan visited the Durango, Colorado, area in 1889 and sampled some of the streams <br />there. As was his standard practice, he visited with local residents regarding fish they caught in the rivers <br />and streams, and these conversations provided valuable information on historic native fish distribution and <br />abundance (Jordan 1891). His collections from small streams verified the presence of cutthroat trout <br />(Onchorynchus clarki), speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), bluehead sucker (Pantosteus <br />discobolus), and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi), native fishes of cooler streams. Local residents told him <br />about fish they caught for food, including tlannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), razorback sucker, <br />and Colorado pikeminnow. Area residents indicated that Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker <br />ascended the Animas River, apparently to spawn in the spring. These larger fish were generally well known <br />by local residents of the Colorado River Basin because they were important in their diets, along with native <br />trout (Jordan 1891). Jordan's accounts of razorback sucker and Colorado pikeminnow, although they are <br />secondhand, are the first authentic accounts of these species in the San Juan Drainage. Based on what is <br />known about the distribution and abundance of razorback sucker and Colorado pikeminnow today, the <br />fact that these species were known by local residents and were common enough to be caught in the Animas <br />River, a cool tributary, suggests they were likely common in the San Juan River. <br /> <br />Platania (1990) summarized museum specimens and collections in the San Juan Basin from 1900 <br />to 1960. Of the several collections made by state fish and game biologists, most were either from the <br />upper portion of the river near the present site of Navajo Reservoir, or from scattered collections at <br />access points such as Mexican Hat, Utah (Figure 2.1). Most of these specimens were adults <br />since collection techniques included angling and other methods targeting adult fish. Even <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />2-1 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.