Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-t <br />00 <br />o <br />CJ <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />YELLOW JACKET PROJECT <br />COST OF WATER <br /> <br />(Annual Cost/Acre-Foot of Yield) <br /> <br />Funding Source <br />CWCB Funding <br /> <br />Avery <br />1982 1990 <br /> <br />A lternat i ves <br />Sawmill Mountain <br />1982 1990 <br /> <br />Warner Point <br />1982 1990 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />126 <br />281 <br /> <br />121 <br />287 <br /> <br />204 <br />481 <br /> <br />76 <br />187 <br /> <br />126 <br /> <br />Revenue Bond <br /> <br />167 <br /> <br />312 <br /> <br />lA11 alternatives have an annual yield of 87,500 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Schedule <br />A project oR-line date in early 1990 would be practical if a decision ,were <br />made to begin detailed studies and such studies wer~ initiated by mid-1983. <br />The critical items on the schedule to meet thi~ on-line date would be <br />Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licensing and water rights transfer <br />proceedings for Warner Point and water rights transfer and Army Corps of <br />Engineers' 404 permit proceedings for Avery and Sawmill Mountain. <br /> <br />Overview <br />The YJWCD water rights, through the use of mainstem or off-channel storage, <br />can supply 87,500 acre-feet of water even in an extremely dry year. <br />Mainstem storage also has the potential advantage of hydropower. As shown <br />in Table 4, the two most favorable alternatives from a ,cost perspective, <br />Avery and Warner Point, have essentially the same costs with CWCB funding <br />and have about a 10 percent difference with revenue bond financing. <br /> <br />ES-8 <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />Hj <br />