Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19. <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />21. <br />plans. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />~' <br />-,). <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />25. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />27. <br /> <br />28. <br /> <br />"1 r'" <br />(\ U1 He: ! <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />Listing IS separated from other events. n <br /> <br />{~1 <br /> <br />Evaluate recoverabilitv separatelyfrom listing [?] <br /> <br />Need to improve the quality of science used under the ESA. <br />- peer revIew <br /> <br />No more moving targets for recovery. Need mandatory delisting criteria in recovery <br /> <br />F ACA needs to be amended or repealed. <br /> <br />ESA processes need to be streamlined. <br /> <br />Failure to involve state fish and v-.~Idlife agencies in ESA science. <br /> <br />Federal policies published in regulations have not been implemented. <br /> <br />Affected states do not have a seat on recove!}' teams. <br /> <br />Negative impacts of interstate management of resources are not considered. <br /> <br />Section 6 funding does not accomodate discretionary uses. <br /> <br />/~~ <br />~!~- <br /> <br />29. US F&WS and NMFS ability to transfer funding burden to other agencies. <br /> <br />30. Policies are selectively implemented. <br /> <br />31. States can't get feds to act. <br /> <br />32. Federal biologists are not ans\verable to a single agency. <br /> <br />33. Administrative methods may be inadequate to achieve goals. <br /> <br />34. Need to develop mandato!}' process to consult \\;th states. <br /> <br />35. Cooperation and coordination among affected state agencies needs to be improved <br />regarding ESA implementation (federally mandated or state-defined?) <br /> <br />36. Federal administrative processes may be inadequate. States need to become more <br />powerful. <br /> <br />37. States may lack their own tools for solving problems. <br /> <br />38. <br /> <br />ESA is litigation-driven. <br /> <br /><~1~~1~': <br />::. -::'---:.~:' <br />'.-.,,-" <br />