Laserfiche WebLink
<br />primarily supported by capital and markets which are <br />located outside of the basin. <br />One of the very striking characteristics of the basin is <br />the absence of large urban populations on the plains. By <br />far, the largest concentration of the urban population is <br />along the eastern edge of the basin and there is a <br />secondary concentration along the foot of the moun- <br />tains in the west. Between these two there are virtually <br />no urban places of consequence. <br />The demographic shifts have produced their share of <br />problems. The large urban influx of population since the <br />1930's has certainly added to the social and economic <br />problems found in most of the larger cities today. The <br />relatively high social costs in the rural areas brought <br />about because of low density populations are also <br />incurred in the cities but attributed somewhat' to high <br />densities. These high-density populations have led to <br />ghetto and slum conditions, air and water pollution, and <br />general urban unrest stemming from high taxes which <br />cannot keep pace with the increasing need for better <br />housing, transportation systems, and, in general, a <br />quality environmen t for living. As the cities proved to be <br />the safety valve for the out-migration from rural areas, <br />these areas may become the "safety valve" for popula- <br />tion dispersion from the highly congested urban areas <br />back to the rural areas. The type of situation described is <br />national in character, and although many of the basin's <br />metropolitan areas are faced with these problems, they <br />are perhaps of lesser magnitude than those of other <br />major cities of the Nation. <br />With its continuing economic and demographic prob- <br />lems, the basin is still in a period of adjustment. It is still <br />in a process of trial and error in the quest to adjust to <br />the physical and social environment. <br /> <br />ETHNIC GROUPS <br /> <br />The people who settled in the basin created a number <br />of distinctive ethnic areas. Even though most of the <br />settlement was by individual families rather than by <br />groups of colonists, there was a tendency to cluster by <br />nationality into cultural islands throughout the basin. <br />Thus, there were numerous concentrations of settlers of <br />German extraction in Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, and <br />Montana; Russians in the Dakotas, Colorado, and <br />Nebraska; and Norwegians in North Dakota and <br />Montana. In addition to the clustering of the people <br />with similar national origins, there were concentrations <br />of settlers from specific areas of the Nation. For <br />example, the Ozark Plateaus were occupied primarily by <br />settlers from the southern Appalachians; northwestern <br />Missouri was occupied larg~ly by people from the Upper <br />South; some areas in Kansas were almost entirely settled <br />by people from Ohio and Indiana; and other areas in <br />Kansas, by settlers from New England. The remnants of <br />these settlement concentrations are still discernable. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />The predominate nationality groups that came to the <br />basin were the Germans, Russians, Norwegians, Swedes, <br />Czechs, Italians and the English, in about that numerical <br />order. The Germans accounted for about 20 percent of <br />the foreign born population. However, if all of the <br />people with a British Isles background were grouped <br />together, they would probably rival the Germans as the <br />most numerous. In addition, there were several other <br />nationalities but their numbers were relatively small. By <br />and large, it is the descendants of these original settlers <br />that occupy the basin today for later immigration has <br />been relatively small. <br />The population shifts, easier communications and <br />transportation, military service, and the general social <br />mobility of the basin has tended to blur the boundaries <br />of most of the cultural islands since the settlement days. <br />Today, the majority of the population has fully assimi- <br />lated and is approaching the cosmopolitan attitude <br />exhibited in the more densely settled parts of the <br />Nation. However, some of the ethnic clusters are still in <br />evidence and are distinguishable by their kinship <br />patterns, religious institutions, and the perpetuation of <br />their national languages. <br />The Indians are basically a financially poor people, <br />and are concentrated on 23 reservations. The Indian <br />family annual income averages under $3,000 and is often <br />below $1,000. The basic economy for the reservations <br />has been ranching, some farming, and the leasing of land <br />to whites. Traditionally, unemployment has been high <br />on the reservations with rates of over 80 percent not <br />uncommon, and rarely has the standard of living on <br />reservations kept pace with the rest of the basin. And, in <br />many instances, the standard of living on the reserva- <br />tions has not been rising as fast as in the rest of the <br /> <br />basin's society. Consequently, some of the reservations <br /> <br />are actually poorer in relation to the rest of society. <br /> <br /> <br />Public Housing Enables Indian Families To Move <br />From Bare Shetler, As Shown On the Left, <br />To More Adequate Housing <br />