|
<br />primarily supported by capital and markets which are
<br />located outside of the basin.
<br />One of the very striking characteristics of the basin is
<br />the absence of large urban populations on the plains. By
<br />far, the largest concentration of the urban population is
<br />along the eastern edge of the basin and there is a
<br />secondary concentration along the foot of the moun-
<br />tains in the west. Between these two there are virtually
<br />no urban places of consequence.
<br />The demographic shifts have produced their share of
<br />problems. The large urban influx of population since the
<br />1930's has certainly added to the social and economic
<br />problems found in most of the larger cities today. The
<br />relatively high social costs in the rural areas brought
<br />about because of low density populations are also
<br />incurred in the cities but attributed somewhat' to high
<br />densities. These high-density populations have led to
<br />ghetto and slum conditions, air and water pollution, and
<br />general urban unrest stemming from high taxes which
<br />cannot keep pace with the increasing need for better
<br />housing, transportation systems, and, in general, a
<br />quality environmen t for living. As the cities proved to be
<br />the safety valve for the out-migration from rural areas,
<br />these areas may become the "safety valve" for popula-
<br />tion dispersion from the highly congested urban areas
<br />back to the rural areas. The type of situation described is
<br />national in character, and although many of the basin's
<br />metropolitan areas are faced with these problems, they
<br />are perhaps of lesser magnitude than those of other
<br />major cities of the Nation.
<br />With its continuing economic and demographic prob-
<br />lems, the basin is still in a period of adjustment. It is still
<br />in a process of trial and error in the quest to adjust to
<br />the physical and social environment.
<br />
<br />ETHNIC GROUPS
<br />
<br />The people who settled in the basin created a number
<br />of distinctive ethnic areas. Even though most of the
<br />settlement was by individual families rather than by
<br />groups of colonists, there was a tendency to cluster by
<br />nationality into cultural islands throughout the basin.
<br />Thus, there were numerous concentrations of settlers of
<br />German extraction in Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, and
<br />Montana; Russians in the Dakotas, Colorado, and
<br />Nebraska; and Norwegians in North Dakota and
<br />Montana. In addition to the clustering of the people
<br />with similar national origins, there were concentrations
<br />of settlers from specific areas of the Nation. For
<br />example, the Ozark Plateaus were occupied primarily by
<br />settlers from the southern Appalachians; northwestern
<br />Missouri was occupied larg~ly by people from the Upper
<br />South; some areas in Kansas were almost entirely settled
<br />by people from Ohio and Indiana; and other areas in
<br />Kansas, by settlers from New England. The remnants of
<br />these settlement concentrations are still discernable.
<br />
<br />32
<br />
<br />)
<br />
<br />The predominate nationality groups that came to the
<br />basin were the Germans, Russians, Norwegians, Swedes,
<br />Czechs, Italians and the English, in about that numerical
<br />order. The Germans accounted for about 20 percent of
<br />the foreign born population. However, if all of the
<br />people with a British Isles background were grouped
<br />together, they would probably rival the Germans as the
<br />most numerous. In addition, there were several other
<br />nationalities but their numbers were relatively small. By
<br />and large, it is the descendants of these original settlers
<br />that occupy the basin today for later immigration has
<br />been relatively small.
<br />The population shifts, easier communications and
<br />transportation, military service, and the general social
<br />mobility of the basin has tended to blur the boundaries
<br />of most of the cultural islands since the settlement days.
<br />Today, the majority of the population has fully assimi-
<br />lated and is approaching the cosmopolitan attitude
<br />exhibited in the more densely settled parts of the
<br />Nation. However, some of the ethnic clusters are still in
<br />evidence and are distinguishable by their kinship
<br />patterns, religious institutions, and the perpetuation of
<br />their national languages.
<br />The Indians are basically a financially poor people,
<br />and are concentrated on 23 reservations. The Indian
<br />family annual income averages under $3,000 and is often
<br />below $1,000. The basic economy for the reservations
<br />has been ranching, some farming, and the leasing of land
<br />to whites. Traditionally, unemployment has been high
<br />on the reservations with rates of over 80 percent not
<br />uncommon, and rarely has the standard of living on
<br />reservations kept pace with the rest of the basin. And, in
<br />many instances, the standard of living on the reserva-
<br />tions has not been rising as fast as in the rest of the
<br />
<br />basin's society. Consequently, some of the reservations
<br />
<br />are actually poorer in relation to the rest of society.
<br />
<br />
<br />Public Housing Enables Indian Families To Move
<br />From Bare Shetler, As Shown On the Left,
<br />To More Adequate Housing
<br />
|