My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01434
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.103
Description
Middle Park Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/2/1964
Title
CWCB: Agenda Item #5 Priority Schedule - Colorado River Storage Project Board Meeting March 11 1964
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />l1? <br />- <br />c <br />-' <br /> <br />c:. <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />215 State Services Building <br />1525 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />March 2. 1964 <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN Q U M <br /> <br />TO: Members, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Colorado <br />Water Investigation Commission. <br /> <br />FROM: Felix L. Sparks, Director. <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item #5, Priority Sch~dule ,- Colorado River <br />Storage Project, Board Meeting March 11, 1964. <br /> <br />This communication contains the recommendations of the <br />staff concerning priorities of feasibility investigations for <br />projects in the Colorado River Basin in Colorado under the author- <br />ity of the Colorado River Storage Project Act (Public Law 485). <br />In each case we have used the latest information available on the <br />various projects. It should be emphasized, however, that the <br />available information is of reconnaissance stature only. Consid- <br />erable changes could take place in the project plans. costs and <br />benefit-cost ratios, as a result of economic feasibility studies. <br />We also wish to point out that the reconnaissance investigations <br />vary considerably as to time of study, as to the computation of <br />nonreimbursable items. and as to computing benefit-cost ratios. <br />No truly accurate comparison of the various projects can therefore <br />be made at this time. <br /> <br />We have tried to be wholly objective in our various <br />analyses and comparisons. In the first four priorities that we <br />have recommended. there are no clearly salient facts which demon- <br />strate a convincing priority of one project over the other. Con- <br />sideration was given to equitable treatment among the river basins <br />concerned, namely: the Upper Colorado River area and the Yampa <br />River area; and considerable weight was given to the recommendations <br />of the Colorado River Water Conservation District Board. <br /> <br />It is our belief that the completion of the projects <br />herein listed will substantially complete the irrigation develop- <br />ment of the Colorado River Basin of the State of Colorado. We <br />feel that in the future increased attention must be given to plan- <br />ning additional municipal and industrial water supplies for that <br />area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.