Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.'.".11"/3Q <br />I; lJ" .. <br />from impiementation of Alternative #3 if other <br /> <br />subalternatives were accepted. If groundwater <br /> <br />recharge were recognized as a valid riparian <br /> <br />claim (3c), and if claims for such purposes were <br /> <br />eventually integrated into the appropriative <br /> <br />rights system, a few municipalities might realize a <br /> <br />greater level of protection for municipal well <br /> <br />fields. <br /> <br />STUDY #7 <br />SUPPLEMENTAL WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />Implementation of Alternative #3 or #4 of this <br />report could decrease the amount of surface <br />water available for storage or delivery to areas <br />with inadequate supplies. This effect would <br />occur through the recognition and administra- <br />tion of additional claims to the surface water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />STUDY #8 <br />INTERBASlN TRANSFERS <br /> <br />STUDY #9 <br />WEATHER MODIFICATION <br /> <br />These two studies are no longer scheduled for <br />completion as a part of the State Water Planning <br />and Review Process, Therefore, no attempt has <br />been made to identify pOSSible relationships with <br />this study. <br /> <br />STUDY #10 <br />WATER-ENERGY <br /> <br />STUDY #11 <br />SURFACE-GROUNDWATER <br />INTEGRATION <br /> <br />These two studies are identified and discussed <br />in the September 15, 1982 Annual Report and <br />Plan of Work. The scope of these studies, how- <br />ever, has not been well defined at the time this <br />report is being prepared and no attempt has <br />been made to identify pOSSible relationships with <br />this study. <br /> <br />5-3 <br />