Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />,'f') <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />''''1 <br />,,,) <br />C,) <br /> <br />":1 <br /> <br /> <br />{,:., ''''' J' <br /> <br />,,)"i~"'i'i;nl1l' <br />1c".," v~, ef 'iilrf' ~~ <br /> <br />BuRec costs edge higher again <br /> <br />f '. fter showing signs of stabiliz- <br />ing this fall, construction cost <br />escalatIon for federal water and <br />power projects edged higher this <br />wimer. But the 0.6% increase was <br />minimal, according to the Bureau <br />of Reclamation's (BuRec) compos- <br />ite index for the quarter ending <br />Jan. I, 1985. Still, the ul'turn, kept <br />slight by st rang competition, com- <br />bined with rismg costs last sum- <br />mer to lift BuRec's annual index <br />2% above 1983's comparable fig- <br />ure following only a 1.3% in- <br />crease the prior year. <br />Contracts up for bid in the lat- <br />est quarter were less than half the <br />number in the prior three months, <br />keeping bidding mterest strong. Five <br />contracts, estimated by BuRec engineers <br />to cost $94.6 million, attracted an aver- <br />age of 9.8 companies per letting com- <br />pared with only 8.3 firms in the prior <br />quarter. <br />Inching up. While bid prices for many <br />of the major BuRec construction items <br />remained steady in the fourth quarter, <br />the majority edged higher, but less than <br />1 %. except for steel-tower transmission <br />lines, which posted a 1.2% quarterly in- <br />crease. BuRec's composite index for <br />earth-dam projects remained at a stand~ <br />still during the last quarter, leaving <br />costs at 1983 levels. Diversion dam costs <br />edged 0.6% higher, boosting average <br />costs 2% above last year's leveL In con- <br />trast, concrete dam costs moved' lower <br />by the same percent, leaving costs only <br />slightly higher than a year ago (see <br />table). <br />Pumping plant building and equip- <br />ment costs, after rising for two consecu- <br />tive quarters, leveled off in the last <br />quarter. But increases in the first six <br />months of last year were enough to <br />leave annual cost increases among the <br />highest of any BuRec construction <br />items. Accessory electrical equipment <br />and reinforced concrete contributed the <br />most to the upturn, posting annual in- <br />creases of 2.5 and 2.7%, respectively. <br />This follows a cost rise of almost 2% <br />the prior year. <br />Same story. Hydroelectric power <br />plant cost trends followed a similar pat- <br />tern this past year. After inching higher <br />this summer and fall, overall costs flat- <br />tened out late last year. However, costs <br /> <br />FIRST QUARTERLY COST ROUNDUP <br /> <br /> <br />for turbines, generators, electrical <br />equipment and reinforced concrete <br />structures continued to edge up, leaving <br />composite plant costs almost 2% above <br />the year before. <br />Transmission line costs reversed <br />1983's rapid increase, particularly for <br /> <br />wood-pole transmISSIon lines. Af- <br />ter a 3.5% rise dUling 1983, <br />wood-pole costs climbed only <br />1.4% last year with the help of a <br />drop in costs late in 1984. Steel- <br />tower transmission lines took the <br />opposite tack, posting a 3.1 % cost <br />rise in 1984 following a less than <br />2% increase the year before. <br />The coni inued strong contrac- <br />tor interesL for fewer water and <br />power projects helped spark low <br />bids well below the estimate for all <br />types of projects. For example, the <br />largest contract awarded by BuRec <br />in the fourth quarter was for a <br />Brantley, N.M., earth and concrete <br />dam estimated by BuRec to cost $60.2 <br />million. The project attractred 16 com- <br />panies to the bid table, with the average <br />of the three low bids close to 10% be. <br />low the engineering estimate. The low <br />bid, at $44.8 million, beat the estimate <br />by 21%. . <br /> <br />Water and power construction costs <br /> January % chg. % chg. <br /> 10/84 1/84 <br /> 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1185 1/85 <br />COMPOSITE INDEX ........................... 1.12 1.24 1.37 1.48 1.51 1.53 1.56 +0.6 +2.0 <br />DAMS: Earth ........,............................... 1.09 1.23 1.37 1.46 1.41 1.39 1.39 0 0 <br />Structures .................................... 1.06 1.19 1.32 1.41 1.35 1.31 1.29 0 -1.5 <br />Spillway........................................ 1.11 1.28 1.43 1.51 1.46 1.44 1.45 0 +0.7 <br />Oulletworks................................ 1.12 1.28 1.41 1.51 1.51 1.53 1.55 0 +1.3 <br />Concrete ........................................" 1.12 1.28 1.42 1.53 1.53 1.54 1.55 -0.6 +0.6 <br />Diversion .......................................... 1.12 1.25 1.37 1.49 1.51 1.53 1.56 +0.6 +2.0 <br />PUMPING PLANTS <br />Building & equipment .................... 1.13 1.24 1.36 1.48 1.51 1.54 1.57 0 +1.9 <br />Structure, rein conc & improv 1.12 1.26 1.38 1.47 1.48 1.40 1.52 +0.7 +2.7 <br />Equipment .................................... 1.13 1.22 1.35 1.50 1.56 1.60 1.64 +0.6 +2.5 <br />pumps & prime equip ............ 1.13 1.23 1.37 1.52 1.57 1.61 1.64 +0.6 +1.9 <br />acc~ssory elec & mlsc equip 1.11 1.21 1.32 1.46 1.55 1.61 1.65 +0.6 +2.5 <br />STEEL PENSTOCKS, <br />DISCHARGE PIPES ........................ 1.14 1.24 1.37 1.52 1.58 1.61 1.63 +0.6 +1.2 <br />CANALS ............................................... 1.10 1.23 1.37 1.47 1.44 1.44 1.47 +0.7 +2.1 <br />Earthwork ........................................ 1.09 1.22 1.38 1.47 1.43 1.43 1.46 +0.7 +2.1 <br />Structures ........................................ 1.12 1.25 1.37 1.46 1.48 1.49 1.51 0 +1.3 <br />CONDUITS (tunnels, conc-lIned) 1.13 1.25 1.38 1.51 1.58 1.61 1.64 +0.6 +1.9 <br />LATERALS & DRAINS ....................... 1.09 1.22 1.35 1.45 1.43 1.43 1.46 +0.7 +2.1 <br />Earthwork ........................................ 1.07 1.20 1.33 1.44 1.41 1.41 1.44 +0.7 +2.1 <br />Structures ........................................ 1.10 1.23 1.36 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.47 0 +1.4 <br />POWER PLANTS, HYDRO <br />Building & equip ............................. 1.11 1.22 1.38 1.51 1.55 1.57 1.60 0 +1.9 <br />Structure, rein, cone & Improv 1.12 1.25 1.38 1.47 1.48 1.49 1.52 +0.7 +2.0 <br />Equipment ...........,....:...................... 1.10 1.20 1.38 1.52 1.58 1.61 1.64 0 +1.9 <br />turbines & generators ;.............. 1.10 1.20 1.39 1.64 1.60 1.63 1.88 +0.6 +1.8 <br />accessory elec & mlsc equip 1.12 1.21 1.32 1.45 1.51 1.58 1.59 +0.6 +1.9 <br />PIPELINE, conc .................................. 1.13 1.25 1.41 1.60 1.54 1.57 1.59 0 +1.3 <br />PIPE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ....... 1.13 1.24 1.39 1.48 1.52 1.55 1.57 0 +1.3 <br />SWITCHYARDS & SUBSTATIONS ... 1.12 1.23 1.35 1.46 1.52 1.64 1.56 0 +1.3 <br />TRANSMISSION LINES <br />Wood poles, 115 kv ....................... 1.16 1.29 1.36 1.42 1.41 1.46 1.48 -0.7 +1.4 <br />poles & fixtures ..",.....,............... 1.19 1.32 1.30 1.32 1.29 1.36 1.$ -0.7 0 <br />conductors, devices .................. 1.14 1.25 1.42 1.55 1.57 1.59 1.64 0 +3.1 <br />Steel tower, 230 kv ........................ 1.15 1.28 1.40 1.64 1.62 1.83 1.88 +1.2 +3.1 <br />GENERAL PROPERTY-BUILDINGS 1.15 1.27 1.33 1.44 1.49 1.55 1.58 0 +1.9 <br />ROADS, primary ................................. 1.15 1.31 1.46 1.52 1.53 1.55 1.57 +0.6 +1.3 <br />Secondary ....................................... 1.17 1.37 1.60 1.62 1.60 1.60 1.62 +0.6 +1.3 <br />BRIDGES, steel.......,........................... 1.13 1.26 1.40 1.50 1.64 1.54 1.58 +0.6 +2.6 <br />Source: Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colo. Base: 1977 = 1.00 <br />'Project cost to federal government of water and power projects in 17 western states. <br /> <br />ENR/March 21, 1985 <br /> <br />89 <br />