Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3449 <br /> <br />Small amounts of plant life will of course be disturbed during the <br />eonstruction process, however, all distrubed sites will be revegetated <br />to bring them as close to their pre-existing condition as possible in <br />accordance with Forest Service requirements. <br /> <br />Once the project has been completed and begins operation, no adverse <br />impacts are expected to occur to plant and animal life. (Reference <br />Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Attachment I, Chapter 4) <br /> <br />(iv) The Applicant Will Present Technical Material Describing <br />And Quantifying The Impact The Proposed Development <br />Will Have Upon Salinity Or Total Dissolved Solids In <br />The Colorado River And Shall Formulate And Propose A <br />PIan For The Mitigation Of Such Impacts. <br /> <br />The impacts of the proposed Homestake Phase II Project on salinity in <br />the Colorado River is minimal. The Sundeen & Fifer Report (Attachment <br />13) indicates a one milligram per liter impact at Imperial Dam. No <br />adverse impacts from increased TDS in Eagle County are foreseen since <br />diversions will be made during peak run-off periods. A 12% reduction in <br />flow in the Eagle River during spring run-off will not increase salinity <br />levels greater than winter levels and will not place any additional <br />burden upon 10cal water or wastewater treatment plants, or other uses. <br />The Colorado River Salinity Forum has adopted a basin-wide approach to <br />salinity. The basin-wide approach intends to allow further development <br />of water resources al10cated to the Upper Colorado River Basin States <br />while reducing salinity through major salinity removal projects. These <br />projects are being constructed through federal funding. Individual <br />diversion projects are not intended to mitigate indirect impacts. <br />Accordingly the Cities will not propose a mitigation pIan until such <br />time as all water users within the basin are assessed on the amount of <br />water consumptively used and wastewater dischargers assessed on the <br />basis of TDS added to the river. The Cities of Colorado Springs and <br />Aurora will stipulate that they will participate in an equal1y proportio- <br />nate share of the mitigating measures to address the salinity issue at <br />such time as all users causing water consumption and salt 10ading in the <br />Colorado Basin share equally in the costs of mitigation. <br /> <br />(c) Air Quality: Detail The Impact Of Proposed Development <br />On Ambient Air Quality Of The Area Or Community In Question. <br /> <br />Air quality impacts will occur in the source development area only <br />during construction. At that time the appropriate measures will be <br />taken for the control of dust on roads and in the construction area. <br />The DEIS calculates the upper level of TSP impact during construction in <br />Appendix G of Attachment 1 (see also DEIS pages 4-1 to 4-3). The USFS <br />mitigation measures required during construction will sufficiently <br />mitigate air quality impact. (Note that mitigation measures during <br />construction will have incidental benefit of reducing TSP attributable <br />to recreational users.) Air quality in the development area will not be <br />significantly impacted and National Ambient Air Quaility standards will <br /> <br />17 <br />