Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--" ..,,:-, <br /> <br />,-..'o:~"l:. ,,,.c+:.....,,-~. <br /> <br />00 <br />o <br />~ <br /> <br />Direct Agricultural Benefits <br /> <br />A primary objective of the economic analysis is to estimate direct agricultural <br />benefits. These benefits are defined as the value of crop and pasture produc- <br />tion expected 'with project development over the value anticipated without the <br />project, minus the value of additional farm inputs or associated costs re- <br />quired. The concepts and assumptions on the specific composition and value <br />of nonproject resources or associated costs, as used in this report, are <br />outlined below. <br /> <br />A basic assumption is that the national economy will operate at essentially <br />full employment for the period of analysis. With this general assumption, <br />alternative employment opportunities would be expected in the national <br />economy for resource~ used in the development and operation of irrigated <br />farms, including the labor and management skills of farm operator:,. Also, <br />the projected levels of farm prices received and paid are higher than they <br />would be with significant unemploymenc <br /> <br />Estimates of direct agricultural benefits are based on crop-production <br />budgets that account for the quantity and value of crop and pasture production <br />expected after full development of project farms, and for the cost that will <br />be incurred on the project lands in achieving the level of production ex- <br />pected. Estimates were made for each evaluation area and for the project <br />area as a whole. <br /> <br />The cropping patterns as;;umed In the benefit analysis are the same as thosl!' <br />used in the analysi& of water requirements and prospective farm incomes. <br /> <br />Farms with adequate water ~upplies will require considerably more labor than <br />farms with partial supplies. The additional operator and family labor <br />required is considered as an economic cost in deriving benefits attributable <br />to the project. <br /> <br />Labor and Management Charges <br /> <br />Labor for crop production on project lands will be required during the <br />summer. ,Thus, the summer hired wage rate assumed in the analysis ($1.00 <br />per hour) was applied to operator and family labor in evaluating direct <br />agricultural benefits from irrigation water. A management allowance or <br />charge was made for the farm operators also. This amounts to 15 percent <br />of the hired wage rate. Based on these rates and an allocation of 75 <br />percent of the hours to the operator and 25 percent to the family, the <br />hourly rate would be $1.11. <br /> <br />Return to Land and Water <br /> <br />Summaries of the average value of crop production, annual production costs, <br />and return to operator and iamily labor and management, land and water, <br />without and with project development, are shown by evaluation areas in <br />tables 15 and 16. Net income, cost of operator and family labor and m~nage- <br />ment, and the weighted average increase in net income with project development <br />by evaluation areas are shown in table 17. Deduction of all expenses and <br />allowance~ except those for land and water leaves a weighted average net <br />return to these resources ranging from $34.71 per acre for evaluation area <br />G to $9.67 per acre for evaluation area B. <br />