Laserfiche WebLink
<br />objective to which it was addressed, the conveyance losses for eacn <br /> <br /> <br />alternative examined in the study were assumed to be the same. While this <br /> <br /> <br />assumption was sUfficiently accurate for the purposes of this study, one <br /> <br /> <br />cannot extrapolate this assumption to the particulars of a given project. <br /> <br />Second, the study's evaluations can be used only to make relative <br /> <br /> <br />comparisons among water resources development alternatives. The study does <br /> <br />not provide information which can be used, without further study, to judge <br /> <br /> <br />the ultimate feasibility of any particular alternative or specific project. <br /> <br />Finally, it must be remembered that this study examined water resources <br /> <br /> <br />development alternatives only from the point of view of increasing the <br /> <br /> <br />beneficial use of the waters of the South Platte River to which Colorado is <br /> <br /> <br />entitled. Although some of the alternatives analyzed could also serve the <br /> <br /> <br />purpose of improving the management of already developed supplies, or <br /> <br />re-regulating water imported to the South Platte River basin, those aspects <br /> <br /> <br />of potential projects have been necessarily eliminated in this study. <br /> <br /> <br />Thus, one cannot apply the results of this study to a project if it WOuld <br /> <br /> <br />serve purposes substantially different from those to which this study is <br /> <br /> <br />addressed. <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />