My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01413
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:53 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:22:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.122.A
Description
Paonia Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
6/12/1947
Title
Paonia Project Colorado (Senate Document No. 61)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />PAONIA PROJECT" COLORADO <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />Mountain canal. With these lands fully served with water from the <br />main North Fork River source of supply an avera~e of 6,000 acre- <br />feet of fully useful water within the seasonal irrigatIOn requirement, <br />and an additional amount of early season water averaging 13,000 <br />acre-feet, presently diverted from Leroux Creek and used on land <br />below the .Fire Mountain canal, will thus be made available for ex- <br />change and will be transferred for use. on upstream lands on Leroux <br />Creek. The transferred early season water will be useful only to the <br />extent of providing one or two irrigations for the growing of early <br />maturing crops such as grain and a first cuttingof alfalfa. <br />. During the 1934-42 period of water supply study a full supply of irri- <br />gation water for all lands under the Fire Mountain canal (8,642 acres) <br />and a good, although not complete, irrigation supply for 6,114 acres of. <br />the Leroux Creek lands would have been provided had the project <br />been in operation. Only one shortage of consequence would have <br />been experienced in the 9-year period by watei' users under the Fire <br />Mountain canal. Some shortage in late season irrigation supply <br />would have been experienced by the Leroux Creek lands in each of <br />the 9 years with the average shortage being 19 percent. Possibilities <br />for additional reservoir storage for the Leroux Creek lands are being <br />separately investigated as the potential Leroux Creek project. <br /> <br />Storable water at Spring Oreek Reservoir site <br />Records of strea.mrun-off at the Spring Creek Reservoir site are <br />available for the period 1934-42 which includes the year of lowest <br />. run-off on record. Studies show the available water supply to be <br />more than sufficient to fill the contemplated reservoir active storage <br />capacity of 13,000 acre-feet in even the lowest run-off years. Based <br />on the recorded run-off and the downstream requirements, the storable <br />water at the site for the years 1934 to 1942 is computed to be as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Acre~feet <br />17, 200 <br />43, 800 <br />49,500 <br />44, 200 <br />90, 900 <br />38, 500 <br /> <br />Acrewfeet <br />1940_______________________ 3~ 700 <br />194L______________________ 77,300 <br />1942________________c______ 80,300 <br /> <br />1934_______________________ <br />1935_____________~_______,_ <br />1936_______________________ <br />1937_______________________ <br />1938_______________________ <br />1939_______________________ <br />Return flow <br />Application of additional water on upper project lands will increase <br />the flow of seepage water in a number of the natural drainage channels <br />cutting across lower project lands. As the points where seepage <br />occurs from present irrigation are at relatively low elevations, only a <br />very small acreage of arable land can be irrigated by rediversion of <br />such water. The major portion of return flow from project water <br />probably will continue to escape to the main North .Fork River with <br />only incidental benefit to project lands. After the water reaches the <br />main river, there is no opportunity for it to be used on project land. <br />Ground water is too far below the surface for economical pumping. <br /> <br />Average______________ 53,000 <br /> <br />PLAN AND ESTIMATE <br /> <br />Plan oj development and cost <br />The basic plan of development calls for serving the greatest prac- <br />ticable acreage in the North .Fork River Valley with water diverted <br />directly from the main North Fork River; the transfer for use upstream <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.