My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2000
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Instream flow techniques require integration of two processes that combine detailed <br /> <br />knowledge of habitat requirements (by species and life stage), and the availability of <br /> <br />necessary habitats. Both the collection and analysis of these data bases have been very labor <br /> <br />intensive. Recent advances in surveying technique (e.g. G.P. S.) and computer capabilities <br /> <br />(G.I.S.) allow for collection and processing of much larger databases. Also, two-dimensional <br /> <br />(2-D) flow models may have potential for application in instream flow studies (Leclerc el aI., <br /> <br />1995; Bovee, 1996). In theory, 2-D models offer a significant improvement over one- <br /> <br />dimensional (I-D) modeling by increasing spatial resolution, allowing for highly accurate <br /> <br /> <br />quantification of physical habitat availability. A spatially explicit flow model may eliminate <br /> <br /> <br />the need for microhabitat suitability curves used by IFIM, and also improve biological <br /> <br /> <br />resolution of the method. Presently, however 2d modeling is not widely used for fishery <br /> <br />applications and is still an unknown commodity as far as it practicality for instream flow <br /> <br />assessment. <br /> <br />The original intent of this study was to develop and validate a methodology for <br /> <br />determining instream flow recommendations for warm water fish communities in Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />(Anderson 1999). This is to be accomplished by determining relationships between habitat <br /> <br /> <br />availability and flow using a 2-D flow model to simulate meso-habitat diversity and <br /> <br /> <br />abundance over a range of low flows on several sections of three different rivers. Also fish <br /> <br /> <br />population and species' life history data will be collected within each of the study sites to <br /> <br /> <br />provide habitat use and preference data to determine relationships between base flows and <br /> <br /> <br />habitat availability for native fish species of warm water riverine fish communities. <br /> <br />A new study goal was added in 1999 to submit instream flow recommendations for the <br /> <br />Yampa River and Colorado River in the IS-Mile Reach to the Colorado Water Conservation <br /> <br />Board (CWCB), with biological justifications for a water right filings in those rivers, by <br /> <br />August 2002. The CWCB withdrew water rights filings made in 1995 for these rivers. The <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />:. <br />,J <br />I <br />" <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.