Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Species composition, density and size structure for fish over 15 cm were very similar <br /> <br />between years on the Yampa River. This indicates stable and consistent population <br /> <br />parameters at both Sevens and Duffy between 1998 and 1999. Significant differences in <br /> <br />species composition, density, and size were found between Duffy and Sevens in both years, <br /> <br />1998 and 1999. The differences identified between the two Yampa sites could be related to <br /> <br />biological interactions, differences in macro habitat availability (temperature, water quality) or <br /> <br />differences in meso-habitat availability (gradient, substrate panicle size, rime/run ratios). <br /> <br />A lack offish under 30 em, higher mean lengths for vinually all species, and a much <br /> <br />lower density estimate of only 410 ftsh/km at the Duffy site could suggest increased predatory <br /> <br /> <br />pressures there compared to the Sevens site. DuffY had the higher density of large predator <br /> <br /> <br />fish, northern pike, small mouth bass and Colorado pikeminnow. Unfortunately it is not <br /> <br /> <br />possible to compare habitat availability between the Sevens and Duffy sites at this time. <br /> <br /> <br />Channel catfish catch abundance was similar between both Yampa stations and the 15- Mile <br /> <br /> <br />Reach. <br /> <br />There were large differences found in habitat composition between Duffy and the 15- <br /> <br />Mile reach. At Duffy the dominant habitat type was shallow runs at 49% and that habitat was <br /> <br />, <br />obselVed to be mostly unproductive in regards to adult fish. Shallow runs were only 5% of <br /> <br /> <br />the habitat in the IS-mile reach. Another habitat type that is unproductive for adult fish is the <br /> <br /> <br />wetted-sand pool or low velocity areas with depths less than 0.2 m. This habitat was 11% at <br />DuffY at a flow of 600 cfs. <br /> <br />The dominant habitat type in the IS-mile reach was rimes over 0.5m in depth. Areas <br /> <br /> <br />of deep fast current comprised 64% of the surface area in the IS-mile reach study site. It is <br /> <br /> <br />believed that the high amount of deep and fast habitat accounts for the high percentage (38%) <br /> <br />43 <br />