Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />23% were over 55 cm at Duffy (Figures A2. 5a, 52, 53, and 54). In contrast catfish under 30 <br /> <br />cm were common on the Colorado River (Figure A2.55) and only 5% were over 55 cm. <br /> <br />Length frequency histograms for other species are included in Appendix C. <br /> <br />White sucker and small mouth bass were the only species in the Yampa River with a <br /> <br /> <br />large percent ofYOY or yearling sized fIsh in the main channel. YOY bass were abundant at <br /> <br /> <br />Duffy but rare at the Sevens in both years (Figures A2.59, 60, 61, and 62). By September <br /> <br /> <br />1999 the mean length ofYOY small mouth bass at Duffy was 65 mm which was higher than <br /> <br /> <br />what was identified for fish from 1998 (60 mm) (Table 5). In Table 5, the fish from August <br /> <br /> <br />12 and 17, 1999 were collected by seining and the fish from later dates by boat electrofishing. <br /> <br />Table 5: Mean length with sample size ofYOY small mouth bass for each sample date at <br /> <br />Duffi in 1998 and 1999. <br /> 1998 sample <br /> 3-Sep 15-Sep 22-Sep 30-Sep <br /> 16-Sep 24-Sep <br />MM 60 64 70 70 <br />Sample size 47 60 228 31 <br /> 1999 sample <br /> 12-Aug 17-Aug 24-Aug 31-Aug 15-Sep <br /> 25-Aug 2-Sep 17-Sep <br />MM 38 47 53 65 66 <br />Sample size 33 15 91 23 35 <br /> <br />DENSITY ESTIMATION <br />Fish density estimates were similar between years on the Yampa River at both sites. <br /> <br />The 1998 total fish density for the long Sevens reach was estimated to be 950/1an"= 78 (95% <br /> <br /> <br />C.L) not significantly different than the 1999 estimate of I I 37/km "= 182. This was in spite of <br /> <br /> <br />the fact the sampling station was reduced in size by about half in 1999. The total fIsh estimate <br /> <br /> <br />for the long Duffy station (Representative Reach) in 1998 was 41J/km "= 40 which was not <br /> <br /> <br />significantly different from the 1999 estimate of 409/km "= 29. The fish sampling site was <br /> <br /> <br />about the same total length in both years, but shifted upstream by about 0.75 Ian. <br /> <br />35 <br />