My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/2000
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2: Species composition for fish >15 cm at the Duffy station in 1998 and 1999. <br />Column 3 is for the study area with habitat composition data. <br /> <br /> I.TOTAL 2. ABOVE 3. SURVEY 4. STUDY 5. BEND <br /> Columns STUDY STUDY TO TO <br /> 2,3,4&5 AREA AREA BEND TAKE our <br />Species 1998 ELECTROFlSHING <br />Flannelmouth Sucker 53% 2.7% 7.5% 61% <br />Bluehead Sucker 4.4% 4.4% 4.1% 4.6% <br />Roundtail Chub 3.3% 2.1% 6.6% 2.7% <br />Colo. Pikcminnow 1.5% 1.7% 0.0% 2.0% <br />While sucker 34.9% 49.1% 34.6% 25.7% <br />While X Flannelmouth 28.1% 22.6% 27.4% 31.9% <br />White X Bluehead 60% 4.0% 12.9% 4.6% <br />Channel Catfish 3.0% 0.9% 0.9% 5.1% <br />Carp 2.7% O.9o,~ 0.0% 4.8% <br />Smallmoulh Bass 8.2% 7.4%) 4.1% 10.3% <br />Northern Pike 2.8% 4.0~~ 1.9% 2.3% <br />While Crappie 0.1% 0.2%. <br />While S. + Crosses 68.9% 75.7% 74.8% 62.2% <br />Sample size 1654 527 318 809 <br />Recaptures 270 87 71 112 <br />Species 1999 ELECTROFISHING <br />Flannelmoulh Sucker 5.1% 5.6% 2.4c}~ 2.7% 7.6% <br />Bluehead Sucker 5.6% 3.3% 4.3% 4.8% 8.2% <br />Roundtail Chub 2.9% 3.5% 2.4% 3.3% 2.7% <br />Colo. Pikeminnow 0.6% 0.0% 1.0% 0.3% 0.9% <br />White sucker 33.4% 33.7% 40.9% 37.5% 26.3% <br />While X Flannelmouth 328% 41.6% 30.1% 28.5% 30.9% <br />While X Bluehead 5.9% 2.5% 5.7o,~ 13.5% 4.8% <br />Channel Catfish 4.0% 1.0% 4.1~}o 3.0% 6.\% <br />Carp 1.1% 0.2% 0.2(% 0.6% 2.6% <br />Smallmouth Bass 6.3% 7.5% 6.3% 3.9% 6.5% <br />Northern Pike 2.3% 0.8% 2.8% 1.8% 3.1% <br />While Crappie 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% <br />White S. + Crosses 72.0% 77.8% 76.6% 79.6% 62.1 % <br />Sample size 2092 483 509 333 767 <br />Recaptures 440 \30 107 6\ 142 <br /> <br />section below the study area, and 32% above the study area (Table 3). The weighted mean for <br /> <br />all sites combined was 43% (Table 3). The next most common fish was bluehead sucker. The <br /> <br />study area had the highest percent of blue head sucker, almost as common as flannel mouth, <br /> <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.