WSP01376 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

".. 2. 2. 1'0 joint-use pool in the studies run over the 1925 through 1957 period instead of the 39,000 acre-foot joint-use pool actually constructed. Kansas also questioned Showing bypasses for Ninemileand Highland Oitch Companies when no such bypasses h.ad actually been made. In response to Kansas concerns, additional analyses were done for the 1979-84 review period. Also, studies of the 1925-57 period were made with a 39,000 acre-foot joint-use pool and with no bypass for Ninemile and Highland. F 011 owi ng the Apri 1 27, 1988 meeti ng, both states and the Di stri ct provi ded written comments on the second draft report. Copi es of the comment letters are included in Appendix V. . Whi Ie extensive comments were again received, this round of comments dealt almost exclusively with the interpretation of the study results, the con- c I usi ons and the recommendat ions. The methodology, data or other techni ca I aspects of the studies contained in the second draft report were not seriously challenged by either state or the District in either the meetings or the written comments. Duri ng the Apri I 27, 1988 meet i ng, the BUl1eau agreed to redraft the chapter on the administration of water rights and Provide the redraft to thei nterested parties prior to issuing the final report. The redraft was mailed on October 28, 1988. In prepari ng the fi na I report, the Bureau of Rec 1 amat i on has carefu lly con- sidered all comments received since the review was initiated. The interpreta- tion of the study results, the conclusions and the recommendations include our consideration of the comments. A. Basic Data Basic data used in this report were compi led from many sources. Streamflow records of Purgatoire River flow at Madrid, below Trinidad Lake, at Trinidad and .at Thatcher Gauges were obtai ned from U.S. Geologi ca I Survey publ i shed records or Division 2 Engineer records. These records were judged good except for winter periods. Trinidad Reservoir daily operation data: summarized on a monthly basis were obtained from the Corps of Engineers. These data include reservoir water sur- face elevation, storage content, computed evaporation, release, and computed inflow. It was noted at the February 5, 1987 meeting in Denver that the records prior to July 1981 did not reflect the most recent area/capacity tables and were in need of modification. As agreed, the Bureau reconstructed the reservoir storage con- tent, surface area, evaporation and inflow for the October 1979 thru June 1981 period to provide a consistent record based on the current area/capacity table. The reconstructed values are shown in Appendix II. Data after June 1981 were used as reported and considered to be of 'good quality. Certified copies of Trinidad Reservoir dai ly water accounting and diversion records for ditches under the District's administration were received from the Colorado State Engineer's Office. The reservoir water accounting records prior 8 ~"- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I