|
<br />lQC,-,
<br />U\.lIJ
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />Table 1, Summa of Pro ect Effects on Fish and Wildlife, provides a
<br />comparison of t e various uses on a project asis WIt out and with
<br />the project In operation and shows the sources of the benefits.
<br />
<br /> Table 1. Summary of Project Effects on Fish and Wi Idl ife
<br /> Kind No, of Units
<br />Use of WI thout With Ga i n or Benefits
<br /> Unit Project Project Loss
<br /> Fishing, Warmwater !!
<br /> Narrows Reservoir Han-day 0 100,000 100,000 $150,000
<br /> Below Narrows Dam, 5.5 ml, Han-day 0 1,000 1,000 1,500
<br /> Hunt I ng
<br /> Upland Game Y Han-day 34,800 10,000 -24,800
<br /> Waterf~71 Y Han-day 15,900 2.1,500 5,600 25,200
<br /> Other _ Han-day 1,000 200 -800
<br /> Waterfowl Use ~ Use-day 1,500,000 4,500,000 3 ,000,000 20,400
<br /> Trapping ~ Pel t 1,400 300 -1,100
<br />. Wildlife-oriented Recreat Ion Z! Han-day 0 2,000 2,000 I ,000
<br />Total Benefits $198 ,100
<br />
<br />Fishing for walleyes, northern pike, largemouth bass, white bass, crappies,
<br />other sunfishes, catfish, and suckers.
<br />Hunting for pheasants, cottontails, mourning doves, and bobwhites.
<br />Hunting for mal lards, plntalls, American widgeons, blue-wlnged teal,
<br />gadwalls, and Canada geese.
<br />4/ Sport hunting for raccoons, coyotes, and foxes.
<br />~ Heasured by waterfowl use-days, one duck or goose spending a day on the area
<br />being one waterfowl use-day. Although a gain In overall waterfowl use Is
<br />shown, the project would result In a loss of 1,000 waterfowl raised.
<br />Trapping for raccoons. mink, muskrats, skunks, beavers, foxes, and weasels.
<br />Consisting of nature study, bird-watching, photography, and related fish
<br />and wildlife-oriented activities.
<br />
<br />Jj
<br />
<br />21
<br />It
<br />
<br />6/
<br />II
<br />
<br />.
<br />
|