Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A lIac);ne/l! / <br /> <br />t';) <br />o <br />(") <br />\-<~ <br />~l <br />~ <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE <br /> <br />The environmental baseline includes the past and present impacts of all <br />Federal, State, and private actions and other human activities in the action <br />area; the anticipated impacts of all proposed Federal projects in the action <br />area that have already undergone formal section 7 consultation; and the impact <br />of State or private actions contemporaneous with the consultation process. <br /> <br />In formulating this biological opinion, the Service considered adverse and <br />beneficial effects likely to result from cumulative effects of future State <br />and private activities that are reasonably foreseeable to occur within the <br />project area, along with the direct and indirect effects of Reclamation's <br />proposed Federal action for the project and impacts from actions that are part <br />of the environmental baseline (50 CFR 402,02 and 402,14 (g)(3)), <br /> <br />Colorado sauawfish and razorback sucker <br /> <br />The physical and biological features that were the basis for designating the <br />San Juan River critical habitat for Colorado squawfish are water, physical <br />habitat, and biological environment, These primary constituent elements were <br />determined necessary for survival and recovery of the Colorado squawfish and' <br />razorback sucker on the San Juan River. This includes a quantity of water of <br />sufficient quality, with a hydrologic regime that is required for each life <br />stage. Physical habitat includes areas of the San Juan River that are <br />inhabited or potentially habitable by Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker <br />for use in spawning, nursery, feeding, and rearing or corridors between these <br />areas. Biological environment includes food supply, predation, and <br />competition. <br /> <br />Water Quantity <br /> <br />To determine the effects of the proposed action on water quantity and <br />alteration of the hydrologic regime, an analysis of flow changes was <br />conducted. This analysis compared the effects of the Project to a pre-Project <br />section 7 baseline (updated since 1991), The analysis included hydrologic <br />information from'three Geological Survey gaging stations: Farmington, <br />Shiprock, and Bluff (near Mexican Hat, Utah), ,Three levels of development <br />were simulated: (I) historical gage, (2) section 7 environmental baseline <br />(baseline), and (3) baseline plus the Project (post-Project). The period of <br />record selected for the analysis was 1929 to 1974, From this period, wet, <br />dry, and average years were selected for analysis based upon water volumes <br />during the spring runoff, The wet year selected was 1949, the dry year was <br />1951, and the average year was 1945, <br /> <br />Projects for inclusion in the baseline for the San Juan River were identified. <br />Pursuant to section 7 regulations, the baseline for the Project included: <br />(1) the past and present impacts of Federal, State, and private actions in the <br />basin; (2) the anticipated impacts of all Federal projects having previously <br />undergone formal section 7 consultation in the area; and (3) the impact of <br />State or private actions contemporaneous with this consultation. The baseline <br />for the Project. includes all historical deple.tions in the ,San Juan River <br />