My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01333
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:32 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/1/1980
Author
Six State High Plain
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Area Study - Energy Price and Technology Assessment - Energy Price Projections
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />project i rr'igation energy consumption to decl i ne over the study period, <br />and three of the four states, Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico, expect <br />the amount of energy used in 2020 to be less than half the amount used <br />in 1985. <br />Two principal factors account for the decline in energy use, One <br />factor is aquifer depletion; all states except Nebraska project a net decrease <br />in irrigated acreage over the study period. The other factor responsible <br />for the decline in energy used for irrigation is that the LP models assume <br />the development of more efficient irrigation practices. This can be seen <br />from the data which show that for all states except Oklahoma the energy <br />consumed per irrigated acre and the water applied per irrigated acre <br />decline over the study period. <br /> <br />6,1.2 Energy Commodity Substitution Under Baseline Projections <br />The LP model results, in addition to showing a general decline in <br />energy used for irrigation, reveal that the mix of energy sources used <br />for irrigation, in general, changes over the period in response to changing <br />relative price levels and technology improvements. Table 6-3 summarizes <br />the projected energy commodity mix for each state. The LP models of <br />Colorado, Nebraska, and New Mexico all predict a decrease in each state's <br />dependence on the energy source likely to be used most heavily in that <br />state in 1985. Each of the three states becomes more diversified in terms <br />of its energy use over the study period. The LP models of Kansas, <br />Oklahoma, and Texas maintain essentially the same energy commodity mix <br />over the enti re study period. <br /> <br />6.2 SENSITIVITY OF MODELS TO HIGHER ENERGY PRICES <br />Sensitivity analyses test the responsiveness of a LP model to the <br />value of a particular variable. Given the acknowledged uncertainty <br />associated with any projected energy prices, Black & Veatch requested <br />that the states test the sensitivity of their LP model results to higher <br />energy prices. Black & Veatch prepared an alternative high band energy <br />price projection, at the states' request, which is significantly higher with <br />respect to natural gas and petroleum products than the high band prices <br /> <br />6-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.